Skip to content

Dr. John Campbell – a danger to all

December 16, 2020

Dr. John Campbell, is a nurse and nurse teacher with a PhD. That makes him quite entitled to use Dr. as a prefix to his name. Clearly he is an intelligent man and obviously convincing since he has a wide following of disciples. There are some 823k subscribers to his videos.

His credentials are not the purpose of this post and they are not in question. What is questionable is what he says with authority. Having watched more than one of his videos his advice is totally and absolutely in line with government measures and restrictions. measures imposed on us without scientific or medical corroboration, yet he advocates them without question. If you have never come across him watch this recent video. His personal rationale can be gleaned from the notice on the wall behind him, which advises social-distancing, wearing of masks and washing of hands.

Of course you should wash your hands after going to the lavatory. That is an understandable and long-established protocol of hygiene. But recent directives are leading to obsessive compulsive disorders generated over a virus which – and people really must start to understand this – reached its peak nine months ago.

With the constant hand-washing blasted at us from all media, supported by the likes of Dr. Campbell, the bulk of the populace is going to end up like Howard Hughes – without his money. Hughes was forever washing his hands. Unfortunately his staff had to adhere to his rituals too. Hughes “was so wealthy he could delegate compulsive behaviour to his employees and so was never being challenged.”

Is it from fear that so few are challenging these extreme and psychologically unbalanced measures Dr. Campbell, and those who have taken away parliamentary democracy, endorse?

Compulsive washing of hands is the least dangerous of Dr. Campbell’s messages to his followers. He is a promoter of untested vaccines. with a particular penchant for the Oxford AstraZeneca product. This enthusiasm is on the basis of one peer-reviewed paper.

Don’t get me wrong, his explanation of the paper is good, and shows an accomplished talent for teaching. Having a talent for teaching is one thing. It is another thing when that which is being taught is flawed. What Campbell teaches is flawed.

After boasting that the paper linked above is the “first peer-reviewed paper that we have ever had on the AstraZeneca vaccine” he adds it is “the first on any vaccine” against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The peer-reviewed paper espoused in his video was published in the Lancet, 8 December 2020. Instead of rushing to be first at getting a product to market a little caution might have been more prudent and appropriate.

Dr. Campbell’s enthusiasm for getting the Oxford AstraZenca vaccine inflicted upon the world is unbridled. He tells his audience it is beyond his comprehension why Europe is “lagging behind” and he uses other colourful endorsements such as “bizarre delay” and “beggars credulity” to drive his message home. It is the errors of omission, details Campbell leaves out, that cause greatest concern.

The peer-reviewed paper shows very few tests took place on older people.

We have reported immunogenicity data showing similar immune responses following vaccination with two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 in older adults, including those older than 70 years of age, when compared with those younger than 55 years.6 As older age groups were recruited later than younger age groups, there has been less time for cases to accrue and as a result, efficacy data in these cohorts are currently limited by the small number of cases, but additional data will be available in future analyses.

It is cynical to think that the “additional data” may well be coming from poor people in care homes and elsewhere in older age brackets. These victims, who may have memory and other age-related problems, have not been told they are guinea pigs. The rest of us have not been told our elderly relatives are being experimented on with a vaccine rushed out and funded by those in whose interests the experiments are being performed. That is another thing Campbell left out.

He holds the “paper” up in triumph, as though he has just been awarded an MBE, but he is very careful that all its contents are not available for public scrutiny. Had he let the camera scroll a little further down the paper viewers would have learned that among its funding bodies are: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, NIHR, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and AstraZeneca. No conflict of interest there then!

Dr John is an endearing, avuncular kind of character who tells viewers he has “been giving intravenous vaccines for decades”. His sincerity in this respect is not in question. It is what he teaches that is questionable. He prioritises getting the UK vaccine out within the next week or two based on this one self-funded study. This is reckless, and more reckless, he may leave those watching the video, who merely hear what they want to hear, with a belief that the vaccine is 100% safe (22 minutes). In fairness, he does say elsewhere that no vaccine is totally safe.

That is the message we all should be taking on board.

What Dr Campbell left out

As well as not revealing the peer-reviewed paper’s funding sources, or the fact that a negligible amount of testing had been done on the elderly, the main question still goes unanswered. What are they vaccinating against? This graph, from the Office of National Statistics, shows there was no major pandemic and the virus has simply followed a familiar path nearly all viruses take.

The horizontal line does not cover the period 1901-2020. as it might appear, but just from January to August 2020. It has been drawn across to compare previous years of flu and pneumonia deaths against 2020 for flu, pneumonia and COVID-19. The graph, and what a brilliant 1,000 word picture it is, has a misleading heading. Although it states that there have been more deaths from COVID-19 than in any year since 2000 it fails to mention that flu and pneumonia deaths have plummeted, indicating that some may well have been added to the COVID-19 death toll. The huge spire at 1919-20 shows what a real pandemic looks like. 2020 has only been abnormal because the likes of Matt Hancock, Boris Johnson and Dr. Campbell have made it abnormal.

This so-called pandemic is the UK government’s reefer from which only those who removed parliamentary law and normal debate through the Coronavirus Act 2020 are getting any kick. It has an awful niff about it. It reeks of “master race” mentality the “final solution” of which would eventually see the eradication of all people thought to be of no more value than factors of production.

Tests on vaccines for SARS-COV-2 have been fast-tracked in an experiment like none before. There are countless stories of vaccines and medication being tested, often on the military, or in underdeveloped countries, where adverse reactions only become known years into the future. Anthrax is a case in point where British soldiers were vaccinated in the second Gulf War even though Gulf War syndrome was shown to be an illness caused by Anthrax vaccination in the first Gulf War. Another case in point is Thalidomide.

Thalidomide was originally developed and tested in the concentration camps of German occupation. It was later marketed by Chemie Grünenthal. The chairman of the Grünenthal’s advisory committee at this time was Otto Ambros, an inventor of the nerve-gas sarin, and a man guilty of Nazi war-crimes. Thalidomide, as well as leading to death in some cases caused 10.000 deformities in children whose mothers took the drug during pregnancy in the late fifties early sixties.

Its maker, Chemie Grünenthal, a small German company relatively new to pharmacology, marketed it aggressively in 46 countries with the guarantee that it could be “given with complete safety to pregnant women and nursing mothers without any adverse effect on mother and child.”

Does that not sound like the kind of preaching Dr. Campbell might administer to his sheep?

Population control through sterilisation may also be a policy of today’s super-race, a club to which eugenicists like Claus Shwab and Bill Gates well-and-truly belong. Sterilisation has happened so often from vaccination programmes it is no longer questionable. The Nazis practised it on Jews, communists and gypsies. The Israelis themselves practised it on Ethiopian Jews. Bill Gates’ team practised it on African and Indian girls and women of child-bearing age. For years these experiments have been leading up to the proposed mass vaccination initiative now being foisted on the world to rid it of a virus which no longer has any potency among the healthy, something Dr Campbell avoided mentioning.

He did not mention what ingredients the Oxford AstraZenica vaccine contained. Vaccines can be used to deliver other agents. A whistleblower from Glaxo Smith Kline spilled the beans over the ingredients of their candidate. It contains an anti HCG antigen to sterilize women while for men there is a GNRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) antagonist to shrink testicles. This antagonist also chemically attacks the sperm and the dead sperm makes women who receive it infertile.

Neither did Dr Campbell mention that the virus, SARS-COV-2, is man-made. This has been proven and may well be the reason why its full identity, in purified conditions, has never been revealed. All the nonsense from those behind this scam who tried to get us brainwashed into believing it came from bats, pandas, monkeys or whatever mammalian source they could conjure up, have been outed.

Sadly, it is worse even than what has been documented above. In September 2019, before COVID-19 became an everyday term, a supporter of the technology, Chris Burt, described the ID2020 Alliance’s launch of a new product from Gavi, NEC, and Simprints. He explains how this ingenious technology traces individuals who have been vaccinated – by means of a digital ID. In March this year Burt modified his article to dispel fears from those sceptical among us.

This post was updated at 4:58pm on March 26, 2020 to clarify that the program is intended to allow people to receive vaccination and prove they have received it, not to track individuals, as claimed by some conspiracy theorists.

People are quite capable of telling authorities whether they have had a vaccination or not, should they choose, and conspiracy theorists are quite within their rights to question this technology’s use in monitoring people anywhere and everywhere. That includes Bangladesh, and Austin, where the globalists were working together with “homeless people and the service providers who engage with them to develop a blockchain-enabled digital identity platform called MyPass to empower homeless people with their own identity data.”

Whatever could be wrong with that, Dr. Campbell?

Comments are closed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: