Skip to content

More on the Doctors’ Symposium

Further to yesterday’s post the link to UK Column for tomorrow and Friday’s Doctors for Covid Ethics two-day session is here:

https://www.ukcolumn.org/

These are the doctors and other experts who are not allowed a voice on mainstream media. Their individual specialist testimonies are the expert opinions being denied you by those producing the nightmare pantomime we are living through.

This is the first major challenge of its kind and a unique opportunity to learn what is really happening. Forget about the Olympics. Pull up a comfortable chair. Put on your earphones. Or better still, get the whole family to listen in. What is happening affects us all.

Don’t miss it!

Presented by Doctors for Covid Ethics and hosted by UK Column

From 17.00 – 22.00 on Thurs 29th and Fri 30th

23 speakers over 2 daysThe full pdf of speakers and agenda is here. Use the scroll bar to the side of the embedded programme.

Save the children – not the charity

If ever a charity was needed to protect children from vaccination against Covid-19 it is now. Save the Children is not fit for purpose in this respect. Indeed its whole ethos is one of jab, jab, jab.

This is despite the fact that children rarely if ever suffer from COVID-19. They certainly do not die from it. They die from the vaccines though as families of these two babies learnt. In the US at least 12 children have already died from the vaccine including 3 babies, and child vaccination has not started in earnest.

As if the indignities chilldren have suffered from not being able to mix with their friends, being forced to wear masks, and lockdown nonsense from school closures, are not bad enough, measures to have them vaccinated are nothing short of criminal.

UKColumn meets Doctors for Covid Ethics (D4CE)

A consortium of international specialists: doctors, scientists, lawyers and others are speaking out against this attack on the innocent in a special symposium hosted by UKColumn. It is taking place this coming Thursday and Friday (29 – 30 July) from 5pm to 10 pm (UK time) in an event called “Immediate Intervention”. Experts in their respective fields from Doctors for Covid Ethics (D4CE) will bring the medical and scientific facts at that moment when the world needs them most.

Below is a snapshot of content, and some experts who you might find participating in the symposium. It is from an early draft and this might change. As soon as it is available All the Goss will provide the link. Please share this, especially with those who still believe in the propagated narrative.

Isle of Man – will it ever open again for business?

On a day when the awful damage from vaccines was shown to be much worse than figures released by government authorities a group of protesters assembled outside the parliamentary buildings of the Manx government to lobby members of the House of Keys (MHKs). They are seeking fairness and equality on border entry to the island.

Many people choose not to be vaccinated with untested experimental recipes until the efficacy, or lack of efficacy, of such injections are fully understood. Initial results, released by official sources, do not look promising, and we now know that these data have been manipulated to make the vaccines appear less damaging than they are.

A whistleblower in the US, under sworn testimony, claims there were 45,000 deaths which went unreported in the course of just 3 days. Lawyer, Thomas Renz, is pursuing this negation of duty through the courts and cannot wait to sue some of the major manufacturers of the lies. It would appear that VAERS tried to cover some of its tracks. There was a sudden upsurge in deaths reported between 7 July and 9 July (nearly 2,000).

It is not just the VAERS reporting system in the US which is guilty of such criminal malpractice. It is ubiquitous. In the UK the Office of National Statistics has not yet released figures for the last period of 2020. More importantly, it has not released figures for the first three months of this year – which I can confidently predict will show more COVID-19 deaths have occurred in the vaccination period between December 2020 to February 2021 than in the period when the pandemic was allegedly at its peak between March and May 2020. You will be forgiven for wondering why the BBC is not reporting this.

According to Victoria Hodgson a quarter of the Manx population remains unvaccinated. Interviewed by Paul Moulton of Isle of Man TV she outlined the protesters’ gripes.

We’d like to see a fair and inclusive Manx border entry policy. The current policy clearly discriminates against the unvaccinated.

Protesters outside Tynwald yesterday (courtesy Isle of Man TV).

As a holiday resort the Isle of Man is a microcosm of the world tourist industry. It is all under threat. A wedge is being driven between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Manx advocate, Ian Kermode, sums up this rift calling it “the first concrete division in Manx society”, and adding:

We’re here today because we want an inclusive and diverse society which respects all views, not just vaccinated people respecting themselves but also respecting people who can’t be vaccinated or choose not to.’

Advocate, Ian Kermode and petition organiser, Victoria Hodgson (courtesy GEF)

There are those of us too with relatives on the Isle of Man who cannot visit without going through invasive tests and demeaning procedures – and all for a virus that kills less people than many other ailments. The vaccines are an experiment – a bad experiment. Those of us who prefer to rely on our immune systems for protection are being penalised by the same people who told you the virus becomes active at 10 pm, the same people who erected perspex sheets everywhere as though the virus could not get over, under or round them, the same people who want to take away your rights – including your right of bodily integrity.

The Manx lobby – tourism and the Tour-de-France

Tomorrow there will be a lobby of Members of the House of Keys (MHKs) outside of Tynwald, the Manx Parliament, on Bucks Road, Douglas. Those who can get there should assemble at 9.00 a.m. The purpose is to try and stop discrimination against those choosing not to get inoculated with concoctions of dubious origin wrongly referred to as vaccines.

The cover picture shows Cavendish winning Stage 13 and equalling Eddy Merckx’ historic record of 34 stage wins. Yesterday the “Manx Missile” won the green jersey in the Tour-de-France although he failed to find a gap on yesterday’s final stage to make him an outright record-holder. He still managed a very creditable third place.

This year’s tour demonstrated the nonsense that has been imposed on people the world over. Some 220 cyclists from every continent raced together in close proximity over 21 stages – none of them wearing a mask, none of them social-distancing. Sportsmen know that wearing a mask reduces oxygen intake and could be downright dangerous.

How many cyclists took the experimental jab is unknown. It does not matter because the jab fails to stop anyone getting Covid-19 and does not stop them spreading it either – which questions its purpose.

The whole baloney of the so-called “pandemic” was demonstrated at stage presentations when cyclists were instructed to wear a mask as they walked to the podium. Rules of this nature equate with the stupid curfew notion that Covid-19 vanishes at 10 p.m. the hour at which hostelries must close. Or the ridiculous belief that a piece of perspex at a shop counter can stop a virus getting over or under it.

The rule, of course, was not for the competitors. It was for those watching the sports spectacle. Its purpose was to enforce control over ordinary non-participants and further the nonsensical narrative. Judging from those I saw yesterday riding around in cars while wearing masks, on a stifling summer’s day, this propaganda is working.

For those of us with the gumption to see this control mechanism for what it is, and who choose not to be injected with an experimental gene therapy from Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Moderna or Johnson & Johnson, there are plans to prohibit travel to the Isle of Man. This is discrimination on a grand scale.

It is important therefore that those of us with relatives on the Island, those who do business there, or are annual tourists, competitors and spectators of the Manx TT, be allowed to travel to and from the island without restriction.

Historically, population of the Isle of Man increases massively from the tourist spike in the summer-season. With a year-round population of some 80,000 residents in 2017 – a poor year – there were an additional 266,850 visitors, 129,860 staying in paid accommodation. That boost to the economy has vanished during this fake Covid-19 crisis.

If members of the House of Keys do not oppose discrimination of those of us who regularly visit, who have family and friends there, just because we choose not to be experimented on with jabs which are killing thousands, damage to the economy will only deteriorate further. It will also demonstrate that the Isle of Man is not autonomous but just takes its instructions from the UK.

It is up to us not living on the island to support Manx advocate, Ian Kermode, and others who challenge discriminatory acts against vaccine dissenters. MHKs will be seeking re-election in September.

Sadly, this year I will not be participating in the Big Ride for Palestine, a charity event I have taken part in since it began. The organisers have introduced lateral flow tests (which are useless for anything other than damaging the sensitive membranes of the upper nose) and because I refuse to take one I have been excluded from the event.

“As you have said you will not comply with TBR’s COVID requirements, we are afraid that we cannot allow you to ride on this occasion.”

Green slime

Some years back I toyed with the idea of joining the Green Party and ended up on their mailing list. I am a conservationist, fond of nature, and aware that certain individuals are making the planet anything but green.

I also thought that Caroline Lucas was a good MP.

Today I received the most ludicrous load of nonsense from one, Jonathan Bartley, who is apparently co-leader of the Green Party. I could not believe it. He wants people to continue wearing masks and is clearly in a different world to me. It read:

“Dear John
 
It’s not time to take our masks off yet.

Infection rates are going through the roof, and many of us are still vulnerable and unvaccinated. I’ll still be wearing my mask, and clearly the rules should stay in place past July 19.

Will you sign my petition to say we’re still #InThisTogether?

This Government is determined to throw all public health protections on a bonfire from July 19 and just pretend this pandemic isn’t happening.

Yet again, it’s down to the public to stand together and call for basic protections from this virus, with recent polling showing that 70 percent of us are in favour of keeping the rules on mask wearing in place for the time being.

If you’re one of those people, show your support for the protection we give each other when we cover up by sharing your mask selfie, and telling the world the reason you wear it.

Complete the Tweet and share your mask selfie now!

Once again the Government is taking a huge, reckless gamble with our lives, but I know that most people in this country have been ahead of the curve when it comes to protecting one another. I have no doubt that masks will be no different.

Sign the Petition

Complete your tweet

I’ll keep wearing mine, if you keep wearing yours.
 
In unity,
 
Jonathan Bartley
Co – leader, Green Party of England and Wales
 
P.S. Can you donate just £20 to help share our message of progressive Green politics more widely, securing a #GreenFuture for all?”

Oh, my God. Please tell me this is not true. I have never worn a mask. All the evidence shows they are useless against viruses. How can a grown man think differently? Why does he not do any research?

I responded:

“Dear Mr Bartley,

You have totally lost the plot. Wake up. There is no pandemic. Masks don’t work. Twats on TV don’t social distance except on TV. You’ve bought into a crock of you know what.

How could I join the Green Party now?

John Goss”


Cover photo courtesy of OffGuardian memes. They’re brilliant.

A message to Doctors – and you

All The Goss is proud to republish an article by Dr Thomas Binder addressing members of the medical profession and encouraging them to no longer buy into the myths and pseudo-science which has got us where we are today. The original article appeared on the Doctors for Covid Ethics website. Please visit this site to support other experts in their respective fields who are not afraid to tell the truth.

Professor Thomas Binder is director of the echocardiography laboratory at the Medical University of Vienna in Vienna, Austria. He walks readers through a series of pseudo-epidemics used as control mechanisms in the past.

The Prevailing Corona Nonsense Narrative, Debunked in 10 or 26 Minutes

Analysis

By Dr Thomas Binder MD, June 23

Dr Binder is specialised in Cardiology and Internal Medicine, with a thesis in Immunology and Virology, and 32 years experience in diagnosis and treatment of Acute Respiratory Illness. This text is largely based on his presentation (German text / German video) held at the press conference of ‘Aletheia – Medicine and Science for Proportionality’, May 28th, 2021.

Versión en español, Deutsche Version

Every sick fellow human and every relative of deceased fellow humans has my deepest empathy, but, first and foremost, has also the right to know the truth.

I would like to present the reality of the corona crisis, go into its chronology and confront its numerous myths and intellectual absurdities with scientificity. The most important studies are linked in the text. Further scientific information, including links to other important studies, can be found on the homepages of ‘Aletheia – Medicine and Science for Proportionality’, the ‘Corman-Drosten Review Report’, and ‘Doctors for Covid Ethics’, of which I am a member.

PCR Testing Epidemic, 2006

As responsible physicians and scientists, in the case of infections diagnosed by quick PCR tests in the context of an alleged epidemic of national or pandemic of international scope, we must always consider the possibility of a pseudo or testing epidemic.

On January 27th, 2007, the New York Times, virtually the bible of journalists whose integrity they could still trust at the time, published an important piece entitled: ‘Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t’.

Dr. Herndon, internist at a medical centre in the U.S. state of New Hampshire, coughs seemingly incessantly for a fortnight starting in mid-April 2006. Soon, an infectious disease specialist has the disturbing idea that this could be the beginning of a whooping cough epidemic. By the end of April, other hospital staff are also coughing. Severe, persistent coughing is a leading symptom of whooping cough. And if it is whooping cough, the outbreak must be contained immediately because the disease can be fatal for babies in the hospital and lead to dangerous pneumonia in frail elderly patients.

It is the start of a bizarre episode at the medical centre: the story of the epidemic that wasn’t.

For months, almost everyone involved believes there is a huge whooping cough outbreak at the medical centre with far-reaching consequences. Nearly 1,000 staff members are given a quick PCR test and put on leave from work until the results are in; 142 people, 14.2% of those tested, including Dr Herndon, are tested positive in the quick PCR test, so diagnosed with whooping cough. Thousands, including many children, receive antibiotics and a vaccine as protection. Hospital beds are taken out of service as a precaution, including some in the intensive care unit.

Months later, all those apparently suffering from whooping cough are stunned to learn that in bacterial cultures, the diagnostic gold standard for whooping cough, the bacterium that causes whooping cough could not be detected in any single sample. The whole insanity was a false alarm.

The supposed whooping cough epidemic had not taken place in reality, but only in the minds of those involved, triggered by blind faith in a highly sensitive quick PCR test that had become oh so modern. In truth, all those who had fallen ill had suffered from a harmless cold. Infectiologists and epidemiologists had put aside their expertise and common sense and blatantly ignored this most likely differential diagnosis of the symptom cough.

Many of the new molecular tests are quick but technically demanding. Each laboratory performs them in its own way as so-called ‘home brews’. Usually they are not commercially available and there are rarely good estimates of their error rates. Their high sensitivity makes false positives likely. When hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as happened here, false positive results can give the appearance of an epidemic.

An infectiologist said: I had a feeling at the time that this gave us a shadow of a hint of what it might be like during a pandemic flu epidemic.

And an epidemiologist explained: One of the most troubling aspects of the pseudo-epidemic is that all the decisions seemed so sensible at the time.

The madness of a pseudo or testing epidemic seemed perfectly normal to so many involved.

I recommend you read this article published in the New York Times in 2007 and ask yourself: “Shouldn’t we all have learned a lot from this for the future?”

Swine Flu Scandal, 2009

As responsible physicians and scientists, in an alleged or real epidemic of national or pandemic of international scope we must always remember previous alleged or real epidemics or pandemics. Here is the last one.

In spring 2009, a highly contagious, very dangerous influenza virus, H1N1, seems to threaten humanity. The disease it causes is clinically indistinguishable from seasonal flu and is called swine flu.

Experts like the German virologist Prof. Christian Drosten spread horror scenarios predicting millions of deaths worldwide. In May, the WHO relaxes the criteria for declaring a pandemic for reasons that have never been explained. It removes the dangerousness of the causative pathogen from the definition of a pandemic. Now, the rapid, massive spread of a comparatively harmless pathogen over at least two WHO regions is enough. Any endemic, seasonal wave of any flu or cold virus, no matter how harmless it is, can be called a pandemic. Promptly, the WHO declares a H1N1 pandemic on June 11th.

Politicians are taking seriously the warnings of the experts and the WHO. Without consulting the population, they are procuring hundreds of millions of packages of sparsely effective, expensive antiviral drugs and hundreds of millions of doses of hastily approved vaccines that are, after all, produced using conventional methods.

Critics who describe the virus as comparatively harmless are ridiculed or ignored initially. Finally, scientists, in Europe, especially the German microbiologist and infection epidemiologist Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi and the German pneumologist and politician Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, gain attention in mass media and politics. The global madness that was already threatening at that time can be averted just in time.

Worldwide, about 150 to 600 thousand people died with or from H1N1, which turned out to be less dangerous than seasonal influenza. Correspondingly, vaccination readiness was low. Nevertheless, in Sweden alone about 700 children contracted disabling narcolepsy, sleeping sickness, caused by hastily approved unnecessary and unsafe vaccines. In Switzerland, 1.8 million vaccine doses were sold abroad or given away, and 8.9 million were disposed of.

There was hardly any media coverage of the swine flu scandal. The temporary success of the media-fuelled panic was primarily due to the interconnectedness of experts, the pharmaceutical industry, the WHO and health politicians. In the end, the seemingly completely overwhelmed health authorities had fallen for an almost perfectly orchestrated propaganda campaign.

I recommend you watch the documentary ‘Profiteers of Fear – The Swine Flu Business’, produced in German by Arte in November 2009, and ask yourself: “Shouldn’t we all have learned a lot from this for the future?”

‘Event 201’: Corona Pandemic Simulation, 2019

The situation is threatening. A new corona virus is spreading across the world. Case numbers on Johns Hopkins University’s dashboard are rising and rising. The highly contagious, immune-resistant, dangerous virus is paralysing trade and transport globally and sending the world economy into free fall.

What sounds like the alleged outbreak of the alleged pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 in China's Wuhan province in December 2019, is the scenario of 'Event 201'.

On October 18th, 2019, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins University and WEF are organising a pandemic simulation under this name. After the Spanish flu, the bird flu and the swine flu, as the pathogen they do not choose another influenza virus, but a coronavirus that is completely unknown to lay people so far, especially not to politicians and journalists.

This simulation of a corona pandemic that broke out in South America is not attended by doctors, but by Western representatives of the organisers, the UN, the WHO, governments, authorities and global corporations from the fields of high finance, pharmaceuticals, logistics, tourism and the media, as well as by Dr. George Gao, virologist and director of the Chinese CDC, the Chinese equivalent of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH).

The participants agree that a corona pandemic is disruptive, can only be overcome by global governmental and private cooperation, system-relevant global corporations must be propped up financially, medium-sized businesses must be sacrificed if necessary, voices that deviate from the prevailing narrative must be censored consistently in the mass and social media, and the pandemic can only be terminated by vaccinating the entire world population.

The simulation ends with 65 million deaths worldwide.

I recommend you watch the documentary ‘Event 201: Corona Pandemic from the Drafting Table’, produced in German with English subtitles by ExpressZeitung in June 2020, and ask yourself: “Shouldn’t the mass media have reported on this in detail?”

Corona Scandal, 2020

Two and a half months later, on December 31st, 2019, the Chinese CDC, led by Dr. George Gao, reports 27 cases of pneumonia of unknown cause to the WHO – out of a Chinese population of 1.4 billion. On January 7th, 2020, the Chinese health authorities identify a novel coronavirus as the causative agent.

On January 21st, 2020, Prof. Christian Drosten et al. submit a paper, the recipe for which laboratories can produce a rapid RT-PCR test for the detection of the virus called 2019-nCoV. It is accepted just the next day and published in the journal Eurosurveillance another day later.

The WHO had already posted the Drosten RT-PCR quick test on its website one week earlier and recommended it as the global diagnostic gold standard.

On January 30th, Drosten et al. published the justification of the narrative of epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission of 2019-nCoV in the letter to the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, virtually one of the bibles of us doctors whose integrity we could still trust at the time, with the title ‘Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany’.

On February 11th, the WHO names the novel corona virus SARS-CoV-2, the disease it causes COVID-19; coronavirus disease. It does so against the request of Chinese virologists. They preferred to call it HCoV-19, human coronavirus, because of the danger that the name SARS-CoV-2 could stir up unfounded fears out of its biological and epidemiological lack of similarity to the much more dangerous SARS-CoV-1.

On March 11th, the WHO declares a COVID pandemic. Meanwhile, its Director-General, the biologist, immunologist and philosopher Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has been charged with genocide in Ethiopia before the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The presumption of innocence applies, of course.

Now, almost everything is going on as it did during the swine flu scandal in 2009, but in an even more lubricated way. Experts, mostly laboratory physicians and biologists working as virologists or epidemiologists, who have never examined anyone suffering from a respiratory infection, let alone treated them, declare that SARS-CoV-2 is virtually an alien about which we know absolutely nothing and that we must regard as extremely dangerous, until largely the same experts will have proven otherwise at some point. In Switzerland, they constitute themselves as ‘Swiss National COVID-19 Science Task Force’ and offer themselves to the Swiss Federal Council as scientific advisors.

The executive and legislative politicians as well as the federal and cantonal health authorities, all panicked by them, accept their offer and seem to follow them as blindly as the Federal Council apparently blindly followed the WHO when it declared the COVID pandemic. Unlike any ninepins club, the now official scientific advisory board to the Swiss government through what is supposed to be Switzerland’s biggest crisis since the Second World War does not keep any record of its activities.

On March 16th, the Swiss Federal Council declares the ‘exceptional situation’, the highest danger level of the epidemic law, based on exactly zero scientific evidence.

The mass media, including the Swiss public service broadcaster SRG, take on the third part in this conglomerate of mutually escalating ignorance, arrogance, incompetence and organised irresponsibility. Brainless and heartless themselves, they hammer into our heads around the clock:

There is a pandemic of a highly contagious and even epidemiologically relevant asymptomatically transmissible corona killer virus. Every seemingly hale and hearty fellow human being can be your angel of death!

Unlike in 2009, the mass media consistently censor, discredit and defame questioning doctors and scientists, including luminaries such as John Ioannidis, Professor of medicine, epidemiology and public health at Stanford University School of Medicine, one of the world’s most renowned and most cited scientists, specialised in science fraud, Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg. After having been libelled, including alleged threats to politicians and my family, by a private person well known to me, myself, was brutally arrested by an anti-terrorist unit in my practice and, after it turned out immediately that I had not threatened anyone, merely the world view of insane people, I was shipped off to a closed psychiatric ward for six days because of ‘self-endangerment while in COVID insanity’.

The governments of almost all countries seem to have forgotten their epidemic plans, which wisely spare the individuals, the society and the economy. In blind obedience to the WHO and to lobbyists, called experts, they are enacting self-destructive non-pharmacological interventions, including lockdowns never considered before, following the authoritarian Chinese role model. They are doing this almost globally, in lockstep.

Without consulting the population, they procure billions of doses of emergency mRNA and DNA injections, that are even temporarily approved by Swissmedic. This technology is being widely used on humans for the first time. Almost worldwide, the constitution, the rule of law, human rights, civil liberties, ethics, scientificity, and common sense are being sacrificed in favour of a quasi-global authoritarian regime under the control of the WHO: Who controls the WHO, controls the world!

All elements of the prevailing corona narrative are invented out of the fact-free vacuum

1. SARS-CoV-2 did not emerge in Wuhan in December 2019. First, in November 2020, a study from Milan showed that SARS-CoV-2 was endemic in Italy as early as September 2019, before the 2019/20 flu season. Other studies showed the same later, for example in France.

2. There is no SARS-CoV-2 epidemic of national scope, thus no pandemic. This is already evident from the lack of excess mortality when corrected for demographics, and from the rather low occupancy of the intensive care units, whose capacities, in addition, have been massively reduced since April 2020.

3. The indication to test, namely not only critically ill hospitalised patients with a need for specific antiviral therapy, in the surveillance system, and in a study cohort, but to test even asymptomatic, formerly called healthy, people and, on top of that, to test only for one single of all respiratory viruses that must be considered in the differential diagnosis of respiratory infections, is wrong.

4. The Drosten RT-PCR test is neither diagnostic for an infection with SARS-CoV-2 nor for a sickness or death from COVID-19. On November 27th, 2020, an international group of 22 life scientists, including myself, published an ‘External Peer Review of the Corman-Drosten Paper’.

We explain that conflicts of interest exist, that the alleged peer review within 24 hours is absurd, and ten fundamental scientific flaws. This most important medical publication of 2020, which can hardly be surpassed in terms of lack of scientificity, should never have been published.

The Corman-Drosten RT-PCR test protocol is fabricated poorly and vaguely, without validation and standardisation. As a result of cross reaction with other coronaviruses, its specificity of about 98.6%, corresponding to 1.4% false positives, which is already low in the absence of any virus, is further reduced to up to 92.4%, corresponding to 7.6% false positives, during the flu season. Everywhere, the test is performed differently and at too high cycle thresholds. Although studies have shown that no culturable viruses are present in samples with a Ct value above 28, the tests are still carried out with cycle threshold values above 35. Their results are reported worldwide without reference to clinical symptoms.

5. The symptoms, clinical, laboratory and radiological findings of COVID-19 are not clearly distinguishable from diseases caused by other respiratory viruses.

6. There is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission of respiratory viruses. What we learned in medical school has meanwhile been confirmed also for SARS-CoV-2 by numerous studies. The ‘asymptomatic contact’ invented by Prof. Drosten in the Letter to the Editor of January 30th, 2020 was very much symptomatic: the patient had suppressed her symptoms with medication.

Therefore, all non-pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic, formerly called healthy, people beyond the proven effective measures to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2, hygiene and self-isolation of sick people, are ineffective.

7. The long quoted high case fatality rate (CFR) of 2% was misleading. Every primary school student knows that it is not the CFR that is relevant, but the infection fatality rate (IFR), which can easily be lower by a factor of about one hundred because of the number of undetected cases.

8. The initial claim that 5% of the infected people would need intensive care treatment was wrong, for the same reasons that every primary school student understands. It led to the procurement of about 1,000 ventilators and to the postponement of non-emergency but of necessary operations.

9. SARS-CoV-2 is not a mass murderer. The most recent realistic estimate of the global IFR is 0.15%, below 0.05% for under 70s. After replacing the number of deceased within 28 days with a positive PCR test on whatever cause by the number of deceased from COVID-19, it is even much lower, well below that of seasonal influenza.

10. An epidemic does not spread exponentially, but according to a logistic or Gompertz function.

11. Due to basic and cross-immunity only about 10-20% of the people contract the seasonal corona and influenza viruses during each flu season. Herd immunity is likely to exist since the end of the Corona-19 season, in our mid-northern latitudes in April 2020. Therefore, an ‘nth wave of a respiratory virus’ is also a biological impossibility.

12. There is effective prophylaxis: for example healthy lifestyle, lots of social contacts, and vitamin D3.

13. There is effective, well tolerated, low cost therapy: for example topical budesonide, normal doses of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

14. The serial experimental mRNA and DNA injections are unnecessary (IFR 0.15%, for <70a: <0.05%, even much lower after replacing the number of deceased from whatever cause within 28 days with a positive PCR test by the number of deceased from COVID-19, moreover SARS-CoV-2 is mutating permanently and in the sense that it becomes more infectious while less dangerous), ineffective (according to the registration studies, which are not worth the paper they are written on, the mRNA injections reduce the risk of mild COVID-19 disease absolutely(!) by <1%, there are no data for severe courses and in >75-year-olds), and unsafe (anaphylactic reactions, thromboembolism, thrombocytopenia, DIC, and myocarditis in the short term, possible ADE in the medium term, possible autoimmune diseases, cancer, and others in the medium to long term).

SARS-CoV-2 is not an alien! It is a newly discovered member of the well-known beta coronavirus family. Therefore, it self-evidently occurs seasonally from November to April and mutates, without human intervention, in such a way that it becomes ever more contagious but less dangerous. Because of existing basic and cross-immunity, only a fraction of the population falls ill. The disease is usually self-limiting and leaves immunity, possibly for life, and better than the best vaccination ever could. It kills comparatively few people and, unlike influenza, no children.

The entire prevailing corona narrative is nonsense. It justifies the globally dominating unscientific, inhumane madness. Such can be wrought with any respiratory virus: if we no longer test all people with a hypersensitive, low-specific RT-PCR test that cross-reacts with other viruses for theoretically one RNA fragment of SARS-CoV-2, but for one of, say, influenza or metapneumoviruses, we immediately have an influenza or metapneumo testing pandemic.

Incidentally, every second-year medical student must study the basics of epidemiology. There, he or she learns that when an epidemic of national scope is declared, a study cohort representative of the population must be formed immediately. It is used to monitor the number of cases, the severity of the disease and the status of immunity, in this case by determining antibodies and T-cell immunity.

Although it has been more than a year since the WHO declared the COVID pandemic, such a representative surveillance cohort does not exist. Even worse: from week 13 to 44, the FOPH had also paused the surveillance system, thus completing the total blind flight.

The epidemic is largely an unreal PCR testing epidemic, but the oppressive measures which it has produced are real; they threaten our freedom, our livelihoods and even our lives.

Dear responsible colleagues!

Please remember the Hippocratic Oath (“Primum non nocere, secundum cavere, tertium sanare”) and the Geneva Declaration of the World Medical Association:

I will not use my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat.

Dear responsible fellow humans!

Wake up, stand up and fight, peacefully but firmly; if not for yourself, then for your children’s future and that of your grandchildren!

Sky News, Big Pharma, the Boys from Brazil

Yesterday, most of the corporate-owned media ran a story about lots of women and babies dying in Brazil from a new variant of Covid-19 called P1. The link is from Sky News. Its conclusion has no science to back it up. There is more science to suggest the extra-deaths to pregnant women, and their babies, is being caused by vaccination.

Many enlightened doctors and virologists – those prepared to speak about it – say that there is so little difference between one variant and another the effects are negligible.

However, Dr Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco, a researcher at St Paulo University said, when asked if it was a perfect storm: “Yes, and I think our only chance to stop this is the vaccine.” Later in a totally partisan article, the call for vaccination is endorsed. The following statement demonstrates the objectivity of Sky News, and its reporter, Stuart Ramsay.

“The entire medical profession in Brazil now acknowledges that the only way to fight the virus and to stop the country being a petri dish for creating COVID-19 variants that will continue to threaten the world, is for the country’s vaccination programme to speed up and reach all members of society.”

It would be difficult, in a month of Sundays, to make contact with the entire “medical profession” but here you have it. Stuart Ramsay is obviously as intrepid a reporter, crusader and super-hero, as Clark Kent. In a flash he was into his gear to single-handedly save the world from variant P1, with support from the “entire” Brazilian army of medical professionals caught in his slip-stream. Fly high – fly Sky.

How trustworthy is the recommendation of Dr. Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco that vaccines are the way to stop the so-called pandemic?

First of all consider the president of Brazil.

Jair Bolsonaro has not been vaccinated and does not believe the gobbledygook. That makes him, and his regime, like that of Lukashenko in Belarus, a threat to the globalist plan.

If regime change cannot be orchestrated other means are surreptitiously adopted. Did the globalists get to Dr. Francisco, making her offers she could not resist? Certainly her department was fitted out with the notoriously inaccurate PCR equipment which can give anybody, man or woman, Covid-19, or AIDS, or any number of viruses whether they have these viruses or not. It is a useless piece of kit for that purpose.

Perhaps she feels obligated to those who are keeping her in a job in a country where jobs are at a premium. Who knows? Her advice on vaccination is not only speculative it could well be responsible already for the increase in deaths which have occurred in pregnant women. No studies exist to support Dr. Francisco for the simple reason that a pregnancy in humans takes about nine months and the vaccination programme has only been running since late last year.

A possible, and more plausible explanation, is that those pushing this agenda are also pushing to oust Bolsonaro because he is an obstacle to their global dominance. Thus, with the help of Big Pharma companies, who also stand to gain, they are experimenting with vaccines which are known to kill pregnant women (and the babies they are carrying).

The Sky News article says Covid-19 deaths of pregnant women – it means, in fact, deaths of women who have tested positive for Covid-19 with a totally flawed test – have risen from 10 per week last year to 40 per week this year. Without actual data it is not possible to corroborate or dispute this. We are not told in which weeks the deaths took place or how many per week. What we do know is that the mRNA and genetically modified gene therapies they are calling “vaccines” are dangerous to pregnant women.

There is “high expression of the ACE2 receptor for the spike protein in the placenta and testis” Dr. Roger Hodkinson noted in this interview. This could lead to pregnancy complications and sterilisation in men and women.

You have to read almost to the end of the Sly News article to find one of its biggest porkies on vaccination.

“The rollout is currently very slow and so far has only started to include 56-year-olds in Sao Paulo.”

It is doubtful 56 year olds will be taking part in Pfizer vaccine trials for pregnant women. Whatever Ramsay says these trials started on Tuesday 25 May, ample time to have caused an increase in the deaths of pregnant women and their unborn babies. And ample time for those guiding the narrative to claim they were due to a new strain.

This is Sky News ethics policy.

An open letter to Lord Bilimoria of Chelsea, CBE, Chancellor of the University of Birmingham.

Sir,

Both my degrees are from the University of Birmingham – an establishment with an excellent record in research and academic achievement. You must be very proud to be its chancellor as I am proud to be one of its alumni.

I am writing to you because of concern that the opportunities we had in our day are no longer a facet of society and no longer available to students. A clampdown (I was tempted to write lockdown) has taken place which separates undergraduates, graduates, lecturers and professors from one another. In its place is a system encouraging home-study. Classroom lectures, university-based library study and person-to-person tutorials are fast becoming a thing of the past. The social interactions we had – in the “pig-hut” (post graduate centre), student union and Shakespeare Institute, for example – are absent from student life today.

This change has been brought about by a virus. Never in my long life have I known the likes of this. The virus, Covid-19, is said to have been responsible for a pandemic. In the press, on the radio and television, in reports from the MHRA, everywhere, this word “pandemic” is trotted out relentlessly – so much so that you would think all medics, scientists, virologists, epidemiologists and other scholars believed in its propagation. That is not the case. Far from it.

Today, opinions which do not subscribe to the thunderous clamouring of “pandemic” and “Covid-19” are removed from public access and any voice of dissent goes unheard. One such example, I bring to your attention is Sucharit Bhakdi (see image). Professor Bhakdi is one of many doctors and scientists who believe these meme words to be the antithesis of true science and knowledge. Their voices are deliberately not being heard.

Enlightened scholars and teachers appear at certain times in history. For example in the sixth century BC widely-diverse intellectuals of their day were bringing forth theories, laws and prophecies that transcended known teaching in a variety of geographical locations. They included Buddha, Confucius, the prophet Daniel, Pythagoras and Zarathustra.

Here in the Birmingham area we had a more localised and more recent enlightenment with the Lunar Society in the latter half of the eighteenth century, cementing the historical significance of Matthew Boulton, Erasmus Darwin, Joseph Priestley, William Withering and a whole host of doctors and scientists of their day, who were in communication with like scientists and educators abroad: Jean Jacques Rousseau, Antoine Lavoisier, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson. They did not always agree – but their views were heard and considered.

Encouraging the cross-fertilisation of ideas, and the introduction of new ideas, should be a basic tenet of the higher education system – as it always was except for periods when Tetzel’s followers were burning Luther’s books and Luther’s followers were burning Tetzel’s; except for periods when Joseph Priestley’s house, library and laboratory were burnt down and destroyed in the Birmingham riots of 1791, forcing Priestley to flee to the safety of America. Led by the mainstream the “Church and King mob” was responsible for this attack on dissenters. Although the rioters were ordinary people, they had heads full of memes, from pulpit and press, including from cartoons by James Gilray. What was lost in those riots was something precious, that all societies should uphold: the right to freedom of expression.

What is happening today, from those who subscribe to this “pandemic” – I freely confess I am not one – Is the same as what happened in Priestley’s time. It is dividing communities and is likewise led from the top. When the higher education system goes along with a meme which does not stand the test of scrutiny it can only lead to the downfall of society. When parliament is replaced by three individuals behind lecterns dictating policy – it is the end of democracy.

So I urge you, and your vice-chancellors, indeed I urge chancellors the length and breadth of the country, the length and breadth of the world, to get together to bring an end to the divisive fragmentation of families, culture, social interaction and the education system (for which you have an important contribution, and duty, to make).

Thank you for reading this. I look forward to the day when once again we individuals have a choice: the right to determine whether or not to be experimented on with vaccines. I look forward to the day when individuals are fully informed about what the vaccines contain and what are the long-term effects of taking them. I look forward to the day when individuals can once more go to sporting events without being segregated, take part fully in all university activities and debates, go to the theatre, concert-hall and cinema. I look forward to the day when individuals and groups can go to their favourite restaurant, like we used to do in the eighties, down Ladypool Road or Stoney Lane: for a curry and a glass of beer. You, and others in a similar position to you, can get together and make this happen. Please do. All free-thinking people will support you.

Yours sincerely,

John Goss

A matter of urgency

“The evidence is now overwhelming”, says retired pathologist, Dr Roger Hodkinson, in an interview with journalist, Anna Brees. Dr Hodkinson believes that if politicians move away from the misinformation to which they have been subscribing over the last twelve months they could still get re-elected.

What has been happening is nothing short of criminal. If you have children, and you want to protect them, you must watch this video! Watch it if you care for the next generation. It could save your child’s life.

N.B. Please let me know if the video does not work and you get this message.

Thanks.

Vaccines – joining the dots

First a presentation of figures that is easy to understand and difficult to refute. In the three months from December 2020 to February 2021 in the UK there were more Covid-19 deaths than at the time when the so-called pandemic was at its peak from March 2020 to May 2020. And it was not just a handful more deaths – there were in excess of two-thirds more than the spring 2020 deaths from Covid-19. This story, which is alarming, never made it onto your TV news channels. It did not make your daily newspapers. Have you ever wondered why that is?

The period December 2020 to February 2021 coincides with the start of the vaccine roll-out. You would think such a coincidence could not be ignored – but mainstream media can ignore anything it chooses.

COVID-19 deaths 2 June 2021

March 20 – May 20            38,216
Dec 20 – Feb 21                 63,655

These death figures from the Office of National Statistics are not constant. The day before on 1 June 2021 they were apparently:

March 20 – May 20            37,443
Dec 20 – Feb 21                 64,419

Anyway, in whatever way these figures are manipulated there is nothing can be done to conceal the fact that there have been many more Covid-19 deaths than when such deaths were splashed all over the news to cause lockdowns, mask-wearing and all the other nonsense from the control-freaks pulling the majority’s strings. A growing number of people, me among them, think that an attenuated vaccine, or a placebo, is now being used more frequently because of the alarming toll of deaths in the initial vaccination period.

So did vaccination actually cause the Covid-19 deaths?

A difficulty for ordinary individuals, who do not have the years of training that members of the medical profession go through, is understanding the terminology specific to that industry in a way that it can be discussed with someone equally ignorant, and still make some kind of sense. There is no word medicalese to join commercialese, sociologese, journalese and officialese. Perhaps there should be. In today’s climate there is even an argument for a more specific field of jargon: virologese.

When a lay person encounters a medical phrase like “some patients develop a severe proinflammatory state which can be associated with a unique coagulopathy and procoagulant endothelial phenotype” he, or she, either discounts it as being outside their knowledge-base or reaches for a dictionary. It is rare, but some doctors have a gift for being able to understand and explain such virologese for people like you and me.

Recently published is an article, COVID19 – the spike protein and blood clotting which goes some way to bridging the gulf separating doctor from patient. It is by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, a general practitioner, who primarily blogged about heart-disease until the “deadly virus” arrived and changed how people think and behave. Since then most of his blog-posts have been concerned with countering the propaganda emanating from corporate media.

In brief, according to my understanding of the article, there is a slimy substance called glycocalyx which lines vessels in the bloodstream and helps prevent the invasion of bacteria and viruses – just one of the benefits of glycocalyx. Damage this, or “the underlying endothelial cells” and the chance of a blood clot developing is increased. The cause of such damage can “often be” an “immune system attack”. And indicative of such an attack is a reduced level of platelets in the bloodstream. Platelets (thrombocytes) help repair damaged blood vessels and a reduction in the count suggests widespread clotting.

Of all the body’s cells the SARS-Cov2 virus can only gain entry to those cells with an angiotensin II receptor (ACE2 receptor). Cells with this receptor predominate in the lungs, the lining of blood-vessels and the lining of the gut. To begin with a SARS-Cov2 attack generally starts in the lungs. But the biggest danger of death comes when the virus gets into the bloodstream, attacks endothelial cells and causes damage to the glycocalyx. This leads to clotting. To get Dr. Kendrick’s full explanation you need to go to his blog.

My understanding is that a SARS-Cov2 virus when it penetrates a cell, shedding its protein coat along the way, then uses that cell’s machinery to multiply (it is incapable of replicating on its own). Apparently all viruses behave that way. The newly-formed RNA and proteins then associate with each other at the surface of the cell and bud off from it as new virons (virus particles). These newly formed and released SARS-Cov2 virions are capable of infecting other cells. The infected cells may be severely weakened or killed in the process.

As may be seen the process of viral replication entails the sorting of viral proteins to the cell surface. This applies particularly to the spike-protein. Escaping virions leave a spike protein on the surface of the cell. It is well-accepted that the immune system recognises this spike protein as the enemy and rushes to snuff out the infection by attacking and destroying the virus-infected cells which display the spike protein.

Enter modern RNA and genetically modified vaccines. Unlike vaccines in the past the new vaccines do not use dilute or dead fragments of the virus to create antibodies. Instead – as I understand it – they instruct healthy cells to create the virus spike protein on their surfaces without any penetration of a virus into the cell. The immune system then creates B-cells which will in turn create antibodies against the spike protein. This is considered the main purpose of vaccination. However, in addition the immune system also creates T-cells which recognise the “vaccinated” cells and kill them off, just as if they were virus infected – even though these are in fact healthy.

Some hold a theory that when an actual coronavirus gets into the body of a vaccinated person the immune system will attack not just cells damaged by the virus, but healthy cells as well, leading to what is termed a “cytokine storm”.

Since the introduction of these vaccines there have been many instances of clotting – manifest as thrombosis, stroke or heart-attack – as well as of death and other severe illnesses. People should be asking what the agenda really is when the deaths from Covid-19 since vaccines were introduced far outnumber deaths at the peak of the so-called “pandemic”.

Not only are our media ignoring this, they are actively pushing for the vaccination of our 12 to 15 year-olds. The time to challenge government and media is now. Tomorrow, your children may be dead, sterile or irrevocably damaged.

At the end of Dr. Malcolm Kendrick’s article he asks readers to join the dots. That is what I have tried to do here. Hope you can too. You don’t need to be Einstein. It’s simple arithmetic.

(Edited thanks to suggestions from an expert on viruses and vaccines: Professor Michael Palmer)