A nasty shot in the arm – RT-PCR kits and vaccines unlicensed by the MHRA

Aware of the forthcoming vaccine roll-out aimed, it is said, to protect against a disease (COVID-19) that reached its apex almost nine months ago, I emailed the MHRA (Medical and Healthcare Regulatory Authority) on 20 November 2020. My main concern is that people will unwittingly subject themselves to an experimental vaccine that has not been licensed by the MHRA, the ingredients of which have not been made public. Diagnosis of COVID-19 is made on the basis of a test, the RT-PCR test, the results of which are frequently flawed. I questioned if the MHRA had approved the RT-PCR test and copied in a medical doctor friend of mine.

Since the reliability of the RT-PCR test has been questioned . . . it is important to know that the MHRA has done its duty in protecting the public from potentially harmful health-care products. Please reassure me that procedures have been followed and that this product the (RT-PCR test) has been approved by the authority. Thank you.”

The response was mind-blowing.

There are literally 100s of CE marked Covid RT-PCR tests available on the EU market.

Such tests require a self-declaration process undertaken by the manufacturer with no review of performance data by any EU Government Body or Notified Body and that MHRA does not approve such products.

However, I can confirm that all PCR kits used by government laboratories or their subcontractors have been subject to rigorous validation by them before use.”

How can anyone possibly confirm that rigorous validation has taken place if these tests are not monitored? It raised an alarm to think results from all the “100s” of RT-PCR tests which the UK government, and other governments of the world, use in checking for COVID -19 are reached using kits that are self-regulated “by the manufacturer”. It is more than disturbing. There is no authority reviewing the tests and no authority reviewing results from the tests. It was necessary to delve further.

Who is checking how positive tests are arrived at? How many amplifications are being used in tests? Is this consistent across all testing stations?”

The answer, which did not address the questions, raised even more concerns, including the competency of the MHRA.

There is no relation to vaccinating human volunteers and the use of an RT-PCR test.

I can also confirm that trials of the vaccines was approved by the normal rigorous processes.”

Whether intentionally, or through ignorance, both these sentences are blatantly false.

Within the last week the Assets Publishing Service of the UK government issued a document to Healthcare professionals on how to administer the PfizerBioNTech vaccine.

It quite clearly states that there is now, and since trials began always has been, a relationship between “vaccinating human volunteers and the use of an RT-PCR test.” In section 5.1 which discusses results from trials it explains the two criteria which were, and still are, being adopted:

Confirmed cases were determined by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and at least 1 symptom consistent with COVID-19 disease*.

*Case definition (at least 1 of): fever, new or increased cough, new or increased shortness of breath; chills, new or increased muscle pain, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, diarrhoea or vomiting.”

As to confirmation that vaccine trials were “approved by the normal rigorous processes” the whole document disproves any such claim. Approval has been granted on the basis of a measure only normally used in extreme emergencies, for example during the spread of “pathogenic agents, toxins, chemical agents or nuclear radiation.” It is called REG 174 (Regulation 174) a regulation which has recently been updated. Right at the start of the Assets Publishing Service document it states that:

This medicinal product [REG 174] does not have a UK marketing authorisation but has been given authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care and the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus in individuals aged16 years of age and over.”

Whatever it is, it is not “normal rigorous” procedure. This vaccine is being rushed through in a process that can normally take up to ten years to complete. Even today no approved vaccine exists for SARS-COV from the 2003 epidemic, and indeed, no approval exists for any of the SARS/MERS family of viruses.

What is happening is a human experiment with a vaccine that has had minimal testing, of which the full recipe of ingredients is being kept secret.

That, in itself, ought to raise alarm – but the only alarms being raised seem to be of the nature whether people are wearing masks, obeying lockdown restrictions, washing their hands and social distancing.

We should be really worried about the PfizerBioNTech vaccine, and other vaccines, which contain ingredients designed to sterilize volunteers or change our DNA in a government-promoted scheme, the adverse results of which may not be known for decades.

Thanks to a GlaxoKlineSmith whistleblower whose evidence was presented on the David Knight Show (taken down by YouTube) we know that GKS was (is?) planning to use an ingredient in its COVID-19 vaccine, an anti-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) antigen, which causes infertility in women and in men. In men their testicles shrink, testosterone levels fall, the sperm is chemically attacked and dead sperm goes on to make women infertile too. In women. it:

“. . . produces antibodies which combine with HCG to render it biologically inactive . . . Out of 63 women they ][GSK] tested with HCG 61 of them became infertile. . . “

It would seem also that Pfizer BioNTech’s vaccine has life-threatening contents.

The last email I received from the MHRA confirmed my suspicion that this is a sensitive subject which the MHRA chooses to nip in the bud.

I am sorry John but I do not have the time to deal with repeated communications with you as I am dealing with 100s of emails a day. This will be my last email to you.

The trials regarding vaccines have not been rushed through in terms of the MHRA’s involvement and we have applied the same level of scrutiny as it has historically done so for others.

The evidence that the vaccine is working or not depends on how many people contract the virus who have had the vaccine to those who have not been given it.”

His last sentence took me back full circle to my initial question about the reliability of the RT-PCR test which the MHRA has consistently neglected to monitor for accuracy, and which, despite assurance to the contrary, is being used in vaccine tests. The whole process reminded me of the plight of Daniel Doyce from Charles Dickens’ Little Dorrit.

Doyce was an engineer who tried to get his invention patented. For years he went backwards and forwards to the Circumlocution Office being sent from department to department without ever being given any constructive advice. Unable to make progress Doyce eventually took his creation abroad where he and it were a success. The trouble is with today’s regulatory authorities there is nowhere abroad to take our worries since the European Medicine Agency (EMA) is as complicit with Big Pharma’s aims as our own MHRA.

As the employee at MHRA did not have time “to deal with repeated communications” I emailed back to see if there was somebody else who could address my concerns. Previous correspondence had been answered quickly but it is two weeks now since I had a response to my last and I am not expecting another. When members of the public are worried about the safety and accuracy of medical products it is the MHRA’s duty to act.

Attempts to elicit the truth can be frustrating. It is in the interests of our families and friends, and their families and friends, to find out why the MHRA is not doing its job with regard to the RT-PCR test. Without doubt my questions have rattled the authority’s cage. Although it refuses to engage with me further I like to think there are others, concerned enough for their families and friends’ welfare and future on this beautiful planet of ours, who might wish to know why the RT-PCR test has not been given full scrutiny.

Close ties between big pharmaceutical conglomerates and their regulatory authorities raise suspicions as to their impartiality. In its questions and answers section the MHRA attempts to put these suspicions quietly to bed.

8. Why does the MHRA accept money from pharmaceutical industry? Isn’t this a conflict of interest?

Companies have to pay a fee for their marketing authorisation but we don’t seek business from them. Any complex licensing decisions are referred to the Agency’s independent advisory committees. These members must register any interests they have in the industry. They must declare any specific ones and take no part in discussions on that subject.

The agency’s independent advisory committees are another matter altogether and serious concerns have been raised as to how independent they really are. For example, in a June meeting of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, the minutes of which are still in draft form, we note that the Medical Advisor is Professor Jonathan Van Tam – a recent spokesman on the BBC promoting the virtues and safety of Pfizer BioNTech’s new vaccine while at the same time attempting to ameliorate public concern that these untested vaccines might indeed be dangerous.

Unlike most of the others on the committee Van Tam provides no conflict of interest details that are specific to COVID-19 vaccines. That does not mean he has none and contravenes a basic tenet of the MHRA’s dos and don’ts. University of Oxford Senior Associate Tutor, Tom Jefferson, exposed in 2017 the revolving door nepotism which saw the promotion of figures like Professor Van Dam and Sir Patrick Vallance to their present positions. Van Tam is one of three Deputy Chief Medical Officers to Professor Christopher Whitty, and it is not unusual for him to play down or choose not to mention his connections with pharmaceutical groups. As Jefferson notes: “Professor Van Tam’s track record as an ex-employee of Roche, Aventis Pasteur MSD and SmithKline Beecham (now GSK) has been excluded from the official DH press release . . .”

The “independent” CEO of the MHRA, Dr. June Raine, issued a statement on 19 November 2019, espousing the virtues of the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine trials.

She outlines the two routes available in approving a vaccine for use, namely, the emergency route (REG 174) which is now being made operational and the proper route which normally takes years. In these “new normal” days the MHRA has committed itself to “rigorously assess the data in the shortest time possible, without compromising the thoroughness of our review” regardless of which route is adopted. She fails to mention the RT-PCR test which is being used to determine results.

In the dangerous and untested vaccine experiments the unmonitored RT-PCR test is possibly the MHRA and the government’s weakest link. Interested parties can email the authority in the first instance at:


7 thoughts on “A nasty shot in the arm – RT-PCR kits and vaccines unlicensed by the MHRA

  1. Great essay/article.

    Covid is likely a huge Lie – Using the U.S. & Sweden Death Numbers, and Examining Other Evidence.

    Covid has become perhaps one of the greatest hoaxes perpetrated upon humankind.

    The RT-PCR test results are phony/misleading:

    As per the disclamer included with the RT-PCR tests, these tests merely detect antibodies, from either past or present infection, from any number of coronavirus strains (even those causing mild colds/mild flu’s).
    It is likely that at least half of the people on the planet have had one of these strains of coronavirus in their lifetime, thus will likely show a “positive” test result.

    As such, it is being used as the main basis for causing global panic.

    See attached image of RT-PCR test disclaimer (this disclaimer was taken directly from a sample report provided by Quest Diagnostics and CityMD.

    Note these sentences included in that disclaimer:
    “Antibody tests have not been shown to definitively diagnose or exclude SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
    “Results from antibody testing should not be used as the sole basis to diagnose or exclude SARS-CoV-2 infection or to inform infection status.”
    “Positive results could also be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains.”

    The Nov. 26, 2020 Johns Hopkins Newsletter had an article by YANNI GU, detailing the results of a study conducted by Genevieve Briand examining the supposed deaths in the U.S. from “covid”.

    In that article Briand wrote:
    “These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”
    “This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception?”
    “When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since
    heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As
    Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes,
    there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all
    other causes.”

    That article can be found here:

    I decided to analyze 2020 deaths numbers in Sweden.

    I compiled a chart showing 10-year population and death numbers.
    One can see that the 2020 death rate in Sweden is perfectly normal, despite media reports of some 5,200-plus excess deaths from “covid”.

    In fact, if December plays-out as has Jan-Nov, 2020 will be one of the least deadly years in Sweden (third lowest death rate over the past 10 years).

    That chart can be found here:.

    This chart was created using numbers provided by Statistics Sweden, which is the official stats keeping agency of the Swedish government.

    The “Father of Spin”, Edward Bernays, was a master of manipulation and propaganda.
    But he was not the father of the techniques he used.
    He often simply borrowed time-proven methods and tactics of propaganda from those before him, like the Ancient Greeks & Romans.

    But Bernays wrote:
    “If you can influence the leaders, either with or without their conscious cooperation, you automatically influence the group which they sway.”

    Like the Ancient Greeks & Romans, pop-culture (entertainment, sports, politics, etc.) is again paving the way for that massive propaganda.

    We are seeing that, to extremes, today.

    From “learned professionals” to business leaders to Politicians to Reporters, the most influential groups are being manipulated first, and then being used to manipulate the rest of the populations.

    And often without their knowledge of their involvement.

    And few are the wiser.

    Note how Hollywood and sport events & athletes are increasingly being used to convince their fans & followers.

    We’re seeing much the same that was witnessed during the period of Scholasticism of the Medieval period.

    Degreed and titled persons (like Dr’s, PhD’s, Professors, Scientists, Researchers, CEO’s, Presidents and such) are simply those most willing to comply with the abuses & corruptions of the Establishment system (the Aristocracy).
    And often without their knowledge of their involvement.

    And few are the wiser.

    Those degrees & titles are increasingly being awarded to those willing to complacently follow the establishment system.
    Universities, colleges and trade schools are increasingly reliant on funding by that Aristocracy.

    It’s a campaign of massive, top-down propaganda.
    Trickle-down population control.

    Even Politicians, regardless whether representing the “Left” or the “Right” are increasingly serving merely at the behest of that Aristocracy.
    The most powerful & influential Politicians, of most every major party, are receiving most of their campaign finance funding from corporations owned by the same Cartel of largest investment banks, which exist as the largest owners of those corporations.
    That Cartel now exists as the largest owners of the largest “competing” corporations, in most every single industry.
    Plus, they also largely exist as the largest shareholders/investors of each other.
    Like a true Cartel.

    Like the Church in the Medieval period, and that period of Scholasticism, the Aristocrats are now, again, controlling most of the information, and manipulating it to justify & promulgate their narratives.

    But they’re using phony “partisan” politics to keep the common masses divided, busily distracted blaming & fighting against one another.
    Note how the largest & most influential institutions (like the WEF), NGO’s, and think tanks (like the CFR, the Atlantic Council, et al) each transcend those phony partisan politics.

    And yet that seeming human instinct for “in-group” belonging, and subsequent groupthink mentality are being used against the common masses, as they continue to simply follow their leaders.
    Leaders that are being propagandized and manipulated, first.

    And much like during the age of the Inquisitions, any opposition to and/or challenges against this corrupted Establishment system is regarded as heresy, or lunacy, or even criminal.

    True Dissidents face mass public-ridicule at best, legal prosecutions at worst.

    This world desperately needs a new Enlightenment.
    A real Enlightenment.
    Not more pseudo-Liberal “education” (which has just taken the form of corporate indoctrination).

    This world also needs far more people willing to question the presumptive “leaders”.

    19th-20th century Philosopher, Thinker, Logician and Polymath Bertrand Russell wrote:
    “habit of basing convictions upon evidence, and of giving to them only that degree or certainty which the evidence warrants, would, if it became general, cure most of the ills from which the world suffers.”
    -Quoted in G Simmons Calculus Gems (New York 1992)-

    This world desperately needs far more people willing to seek-out, find, and analyze the empirical evidence.
    Those willing to question the conventional narratives, even continually question their own beliefs & biases, by relying on more data, evidence, and such.
    Those unafraid of being labeled “eccentric” for their refusal to follow the Establishment-led Aristocratic system.

    Knowledge is power.


    1. Rare gems of philosophical thought are always welcome in comments on this blog. Thank you for the comment. Thank you for being aware. We must keep proselytising among the ovine somnambulists until they rise like lions from their slumber.

      Thank you too for the links and your chart which I am just about to take a look at.


  2. Three article links re the ‘Casedemic’ scam of PCR testing:
    ‘Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany Over Drosten PCR Test’:
    ‘The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society’:
    ‘Right On Cue For Biden, WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce COVID False Positives’:
    The PTB are fully aware of the problems of the PCR test, which is why they will not be drawn into discussing them. The false high ‘cases’ give them an excuse to order the Lockdowns, to further their NWO Great Reset Agenda, part of which is as universal vaxxing as they can manage.
    Well, they can ‘manage’ without me.


Comments are closed.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: