Skip to content

Experts explain why vaccines against Covid-19 are unnecessary and dangerous

Today I hand my blog over to Doctors for Covid Ethics (D4CE). You need to read and share this because it comes from a group of the most highly-respected members of the medical and scientific world. You might also be well-advised to listen and watch less of the corporate-owned mainstream media, all of which are following an agenda, the ethics of which are questionable.

Furthermore, this article could save your life. Members of the medical profession who are pushing vaccines, and being financially rewarded to push them, need to take a look at themselves in the light of the Nuremberg code.

COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy and Safety

Doctors for Covid Ethics1 day ago·14 min read

Abstract: COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm. It is therefore in the interests of all those authorising, enforcing and administering COVID-19 vaccinations to understand the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of these vaccines, since liability for harm will fall on them.

In short, the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe.

  • Necessity: Immunocompetent individuals are protected against SARS-CoV-2 by cellular immunity. Vaccinating low-risk groups is therefore unnecessary. For immunocompromised individuals who do fall ill with COVID-19 there is a range of medical treatments that have been proven safe and effective. Vaccinating the vulnerable is therefore equally unnecessary. Both immunocompetent and vulnerable groups are better protected against variants of SARS-CoV-2 by naturally acquired immunity and by medication than by vaccination.
  • Efficacy: Covid-19 vaccines lack a viable mechanism of action against SARS-CoV-2 infection of the airways. Induction of antibodies cannot prevent infection by an agent such as SARS-CoV-2 that invades through the respiratory tract. Moreover, none of the vaccine trials have provided any evidence that vaccination prevents transmission of the infection by vaccinated individuals; urging vaccination to “protect others” therefore has no basis in fact.
  • Safety: The vaccines are dangerous to both healthy individuals and those with pre-existing chronic disease, for reasons such as the following: risk of lethal and non-lethal disruptions of blood clotting including bleeding disorders, thrombosis in the brain, stroke and heart attack; autoimmune and allergic reactions; antibody-dependent enhancement of disease; and vaccine impurities due to rushed manufacturing and unregulated production standards.

The risk-benefit calculus is therefore clear: the experimental vaccines are needless, ineffective and dangerous. Actors authorising, coercing or administering experimental COVID-19 vaccination are exposing populations and patients to serious, unnecessary, and unjustified medical risks.

1. The vaccines are unnecessary

  1. Multiple lines of research indicate that immunocompetent people display “robust” and lasting cellular (T cell) immunity to SARS-CoV viruses [1], including SARS-CoV-2 and its variants [2]. T cell protection stems not only from exposure to SARS-CoV-2 itself, but from cross-reactive immunity following previous exposure to common cold and SARS coronaviruses [1,3–10]. Such immunity was detectable after infections up to 17 years prior [1,3]. Therefore, immunocompetent people do not need vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.
  2. Natural T-Cell immunity provides stronger and more comprehensive protection against all SARS-CoV-2 strains than vaccines, because naturally primed immunity recognises multiple virus epitopes and costimulatory signals, not merely a single (spike) protein. Thus, immunocompetent people are better protected against SARS-CoV-2 and any variants that may arise by their own immunity than by the current crop of vaccines.
  3. The vaccines have been touted as a means to prevent asymptomatic infection [11], and by extension “asymptomatic transmission.” However, “asymptomatic transmission” is an artefact of invalid and unreliable PCR test procedures and interpretations, leading to high false-positive rates [12–15]. Evidence indicates that PCR-positive, asymptomatic people are healthy false-positives, not carriers. A comprehensive study of 9,899,828 people in China found that asymptomatic individuals testing positive for COVID-19 never infected others [16]. In contrast, the papers cited by the Centre for Disease Control [17,18] to justify claims of asymptomatic transmission are based on hypothetical models, not empirical studies; they present assumptions and estimates rather than evidence. Preventing asymptomatic infection is not a viable rationale for promoting vaccination of the general population.
  4. In most countries, most people now have immunity to SARS-CoV-2 [19]. Depending on their degree of previously acquired cross-immunity, they will have had no symptoms, mild and uncharacteristic symptoms, or more severe symptoms, possibly including anosmia (loss of sense of smell) or other somewhat characteristic signs of the COVID-19 disease. Regardless of disease severity, they will now have sufficient immunity to be protected from severe disease in the event of renewed exposure. This majority of the population will not benefit at all from being vaccinated.
  5. Population survival of COVID-19 exceeds 99.8% globally [20–22]. In countries that have been intensely infected over several months, less than 0.2% of the population have died and had their deaths classified as ‘with covid19’. COVID-19 is also typically a mild to moderately severe illness. Therefore, the overwhelming majority of people are not at risk from COVID-19 and do not require vaccination for their own protection.
  6. In those susceptible to severe infection, Covid-19 is a treatable illness. A convergence of evidence indicates that early treatment with existing drugs reduces hospitalisation and mortality by ~85% and 75%, respectively [23–27]. These drugs include many tried and true antiinflammatory, antiviral, and anticoagulant medications, as well as monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. Industry and government decisions to sideline such proven treatments through selective research support [24], regulatory bias, and even outright sanctions against doctors daring to use such treatments on their own initiative, have been out of step with existing laws, standard medical practice, and research; the legal requirement to consider real world evidence has fallen by the wayside [28]. The systematic denial and denigration of these effective therapies has underpinned the spurious justification for the emergency use authorisation of the vaccines, which requires that “no standard acceptable treatment is available” [29]. Plainly stated, vaccines are not necessary to prevent severe disease.

2. The vaccines lack efficacy

  1. At a mechanistic level, the concept of immunity to COVID-19 via antibody induction, as per COVID-19 vaccination, is medical nonsense. Airborne viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 enter the body via the airways and lungs, where antibody concentrations are too low to prevent infection. Vaccine-induced antibodies primarily circulate in the bloodstream, while concentrations on the mucous membranes of lungs and airways is low. Given that COVID-19 primarily spreads and causes disease by infecting these mucous membranes, vaccines miss the immunological mark. The documents submitted by the vaccine manufacturers to the various regulatory bodies contain no evidence that vaccination prevents airway infection, which would be crucial for breaking the chain of transmission. Thus, vaccines are immunologically inappropriate for COVID-19.
  2. Medium to long-term vaccine efficacy is unknown. Phase 3, medium term, 24-month trials will not be complete until 2023: There is no medium-term or long term longitudinal data regarding COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
  3. Short term data has not established prevention of severe disease. The European Medicines Agency has noted of the Comirnaty (Pfizer mRNA) vaccine that severe COVID-19 cases “were rare in the study, and statistically certain conclusion cannot be drawn” from it [30]. Similarly, the Pfizer document submitted to the FDA [31] concludes that efficacy against mortality could not be demonstrated. Thus, the vaccines have not been shown to prevent death or severe disease even in the short term.
  4. The correlates of protection against COVID-19 are unknown. Researchers have not yet established how to measure protection against COVID-19. As a result, efficacy studies are stabbing around in the dark. After completion of Phase 1 and 2 studies, for instance, a paper in the journal Vaccine noted that “without understanding the correlates of protection, it is impossible to currently address questions regarding vaccine-associated protection, risk of COVID-19 reinfection, herd immunity, and the possibility of elimination of SARS-CoV-2 from the human population” [32]. Thus, Vaccine efficacy cannot be evaluated because we have not yet established how to measure it.

3. The vaccines are dangerous

1. Just as smoking could be and was predicted to cause lung cancer based on first principles, all gene-based vaccines can be expected to cause blood clotting and bleeding disorders [33], based on their molecular mechanisms of action. Consistent with this, diseases of this kind have been observed across age groups, leading to temporary vaccine suspensions around the world — The vaccines are not safe.

2. Contrary to claims that blood disorders post-vaccination are “rare”, many common vaccine side effects (headaches, nausea, vomiting and haematoma-like “rashes” over the body) may indicate thrombosis and other severe abnormalities. Moreover, vaccine-induced diffuse micro-thromboses in the lungs can mimic pneumonia and may be misdiagnosed as COVID-19. Clotting events currently receiving media attention are likely just the “tip of a huge iceberg” [34] — The vaccines are not safe.

3. Due to immunological priming, risks of clotting, bleeding and other adverse events can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination and each intervening coronavirus exposure. Over time, whether months or years [35], this renders both vaccination and coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom without vaccination COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.

Since vaccine roll-out, COVID-19 incidence has risen in numerous areas with high vaccination rates [36–38]. Furthermore, multiple series of COVID-19 fatalities have occurred shortly after the onset vaccinations in senior homes [39,40]. These cases may have been due not only to antibody-dependent enhancement but also to a general immunosuppressive effect of the vaccines, which is suggested by the increased occurrence of Herpes zoster in certain patients [41]. Immunosuppression may have caused a previously asymptomatic infection to become clinically manifest. Regardless of the exact mechanism responsible for these reported deaths, we must expect that the vaccines will increase rather than decrease lethality of COVID-19 — The vaccines are not safe.

4. The vaccines are experimental by definition. They will remain in Phase 3 trials until 2023. Recipients are human subjects entitled to free informed consent under Nuremberg and other protections, including the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’s resolution 2361 [42] and the FDA’s terms of emergency use authorisation [29]. With respect to safety data from Phase 1 and 2 trials, in spite of initially large sample sizes the journal Vaccine reports that, “the vaccination strategy chosen for further development may have only been given to as few as 12 participants” [32]. With such extremely small sample sizes, the journal notes that, “larger Phase 3 studies conducted over longer periods of time will be necessary” to establish safety. The risks that remain to be evaluated in Phase 3 trials into 2023, with entire populations as subjects, include not only thrombosis and bleeding abnormalities, but other autoimmune responses, allergic reactions, unknown tropisms (tissue destinations) of lipid nanoparticles [35], antibody-dependent enhancement [43–46] and the impact of rushed, questionably executed, poorly regulated [47] and reportedly inconsistent manufacturing methods, conferring risks of potentially harmful impurities such as uncontrolled DNA residues [48]. The vaccines are not safe, either for recipients or for those who administer them or authorise their use.

5. Initial experience might suggest that the adenovirus-derived vaccines (AstraZeneca/Johnson & Johnson) cause graver adverse effects than the mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna) vaccines. However, upon repeated injection, the former will soon induce antibodies against the proteins of the adenovirus vector. These antibodies will then neutralize most of the vaccine virus particles and cause their disposal before they can infect any cells, thereby limiting the intensity of tissue damage.

In contrast, in the mRNA vaccines, there is no protein antigen for the antibodies to recognize. Thus, regardless of the existing degree of immunity, the vaccine mRNA is going to reach its target — the body cells. These will then express the spike protein and subsequently suffer the full onslaught of the immune system. With the mRNA vaccines, the risk of severe adverse events is virtually guaranteed to increase with every successive injection. In the long term, they are therefore even more dangerous than the vector vaccines. Their apparent preferment over the latter is concerning in the highest degree; these vaccines are not safe.

4. Ethics and legal points to consider

  1. Conflicts of interest abound in the scientific literature and within organisations that recommend and promote vaccines, while demonising alternate strategies (reliance on natural immunity and early treatment). Authorities, doctors and medical personnel need to protect themselves by evaluating the sources of their information for conflicts of interest extremely closely.
  2. Authorities, doctors and medical personnel need to be similarly careful not to ignore the credible and independent literature on vaccine necessity, safety and efficacy, given the foreseeable mass deaths and harms that must be expected unless the vaccination campaign is stopped.
  3. Vaccine manufacturers have exempted themselves from legal liability for adverse events for a reason. When vaccine deaths and harms occur, liability will fall to those responsible for the vaccines’ authorisation, administration and/or coercion via vaccine passports, none of which can be justified on a sober, evidence-based risk-benefit analysis.
  4. All political, regulatory and medical actors involved in COVID-19 vaccination should familiarise themselves with the Nuremberg code and other legal provisions in order to protect themselves.


  1. Le Bert, N.; Tan, A.T.; Kunasegaran, K.; Tham, C.Y.L.; Hafezi, M.; Chia, A.; Chng, M.H.Y.; Lin, M.; Tan, N.; Linster, M.; Chia, W.N.; Chen, M.I.; Wang, L.; Ooi, E.E.; Kalimuddin, S.; Tambyah, P.A.; Low, J.G.; Tan, Y. and Bertoletti, A. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457–462
  2. Tarke, A.; Sidney, J.; Methot, N.; Zhang, Y.; Dan, J.M.; Goodwin, B.; Rubiro, P.; Sutherland, A.; da Silva Antunes, R.; Frazier, A. and al., e. (2021) Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees. bioRxiv -:x-x
  3. Anonymous, (2020) Scientists uncover SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in recovered COVID-19 and SARS patients.
  4. Beasley, D. (2020) Scientists focus on how immune system T cells fight coronavirus in absence of antibodies.
  5. Bozkus, C.C. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells without antibodies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20:463
  6. Grifoni, A.; Weiskopf, D.; Ramirez, S.I.; Mateus, J.; Dan, J.M.; Moderbacher, C.R.; Rawlings, S.A.; Sutherland, A.; Premkumar, L.; Jadi, R.S. and al., e. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489–1501.e15
  7. Mateus, J.; Grifoni, A.; Tarke, A.; Sidney, J.; Ramirez, S.I.; Dan, J.M.; Burger, Z.C.; Rawlings, S.A.; Smith, D.M.; Phillips, E. and al., e. (2020) Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans. Science 370:89–94
  8. McCurry-Schmidt, M. (2020) Exposure to common cold coronaviruses can teach the immune system to recognize SARS-CoV-2.
  9. Palmer, S.; Cunniffe, N. and Donnelly, R. (2021) COVID-19 hospitalization rates rise exponentially with age, inversely proportional to thymic T-cell production. J. R. Soc. Interface 18:20200982
  10. Sekine, T.; Perez-Potti, A.; Rivera-Ballesteros, O.; Strålin, K.; Gorin, J.; Olsson, A.; Llewellyn-Lacey, S.; Kamal, H.; Bogdanovic, G.; Muschiol, S. and al., e. (2020) Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19. Cell 183:158–168.e14
  11. Drake, J. (2021) Now We Know: Covid-19 Vaccines Prevent Asymptomatic Infection, Too.
  12. Bossuyt, P.M. (2020) Testing COVID-19 tests faces methodological challenges. Journal of clinical epidemiology 126:172–176
  13. Jefferson, T.; Spencer, E.; Brassey, J. and Heneghan, C. (2020) Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectivity assessment. Systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. ciaa1764:x-x
  14. Borger, P.; Malhotra, R.K.; Yeadon, M.; Craig, C.; McKernan, K.; Steger, K.; McSheehy, P.; Angelova, L.; Franchi, F.; Binder, T.; Ullrich, H.; Ohashi, M.; Scoglio, S.; Doesburg-van Kleffens, M.; Gilbert, D.; Klement, R.J.; Schrüfer, R.; Pieksma, B.W.; Bonte, J.; Dalle Carbonare, B.H.; Corbett, K.P. and Kämmer, U. (2020) External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
  15. Mandavilli, A. (2020) Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
  16. Cao, S.; Gan, Y.; Wang, C.; Bachmann, M.; Wei, S.; Gong, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, L.; Lu, K.; Jiang, H.; Gong, Y.; Xu, H.; Shen, X.; Tian, Q.; Lv, C.; Song, F.; Yin, X. and Lu, Z. (2020) Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China. Nat. Commun. 11:5917
  17. Moghadas, S.M.; Fitzpatrick, M.C.; Sah, P.; Pandey, A.; Shoukat, A.; Singer, B.H. and Galvani, A.P. (2020) The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117:17513–17515
  18. Johansson, M.A.; Quandelacy, T.M.; Kada, S.; Prasad, P.V.; Steele, M.; Brooks, J.T.; Slayton, R.B.; Biggerstaff, M. and Butler, J.C. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without COVID-19 Symptoms. JAMA network open 4:e2035057
  19. Yeadon, M. (2020). What SAGE got wrong. Lockdown Skeptics.
  20. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2020) Global perspective of COVID‐19 epidemiology for a full‐cycle pandemic. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 50:x-x
  21. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2021) Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID‐19: An overview of systematic evaluations. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. -:x-x
  22. CDC, (2020) Science Brief: Community Use of Cloth Masks to Control the Spread of SARS-CoV-2.
  23. Orient, J.; McCullough, P. and Vliet, E. (2020) A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment.
  24. McCullough, P.A.; Alexander, P.E.; Armstrong, R.; Arvinte, C.; Bain, A.F.; Bartlett, R.P.; Berkowitz, R.L.; Berry, A.C.; Borody, T.J.; Brewer, J.H.; Brufsky, A.M.; Clarke, T.; Derwand, R.; Eck, A.; Eck, J.; Eisner, R.A.; Fareed, G.C.; Farella, A.; Fonseca, S.N.S.; Geyer, C.E.; Gonnering, R.S.; Graves, K.E.; Gross, K.B.V.; Hazan, S.; Held, K.S.; Hight, H.T.; Immanuel, S.; Jacobs, M.M.; Ladapo, J.A.; Lee, L.H.; Littell, J.; Lozano, I.; Mangat, H.S.; Marble, B.; McKinnon, J.E.; Merritt, L.D.; Orient, J.M.; Oskoui, R.; Pompan, D.C.; Procter, B.C.; Prodromos, C.; Rajter, J.C.; Rajter, J.; Ram, C.V.S.; Rios, S.S.; Risch, H.A.; Robb, M.J.A.; Rutherford, M.; Scholz, M.; Singleton, M.M.; Tumlin, J.A.; Tyson, B.M.; Urso, R.G.; Victory, K.; Vliet, E.L.; Wax, C.M.; Wolkoff, A.G.; Wooll, V. and Zelenko, V. (2020) Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 21:517–530
  25. Procter, {.B.C.; {APRN}, {.C.R.{.; {PA}-C, {.V.P.; {PA}-C, {.E.S.; {PA}-C, {.C.H. and McCullough, {.{.P.A. (2021) Early Ambulatory Multidrug Therapy Reduces Hospitalization and Death in High-Risk Patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). International journal of innovative research in medical science 6:219–221
  26. McCullough, P.A.; Kelly, R.J.; Ruocco, G.; Lerma, E.; Tumlin, J.; Wheelan, K.R.; Katz, N.; Lepor, N.E.; Vijay, K.; Carter, H.; Singh, B.; McCullough, S.P.; Bhambi, B.K.; Palazzuoli, A.; De Ferrari, G.M.; Milligan, G.P.; Safder, T.; Tecson, K.M.; Wang, D.D.; McKinnon, J.E.; O’Neill, W.W.; Zervos, M. and Risch, H.A. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16–22
  27. Anonymous, (2020) Real-time database and meta analysis of 588 COVID-19 studies.
  28. Hirschhorn, J.S. (2021) COVID scandal: Feds ignored 2016 law requiring use of real world evidence.
  29. Anonymous, (1998) Emergency Use of an Investigational Drug or Biologic: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators.
  30. Anonymous, (2021) EMA assessment report: Comirnaty.
  31. Anonymous, (2020) FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
  32. Giurgea, L.T. and Memoli, M.J. (2020) Navigating the Quagmire: Comparison and Interpretation of COVID-19 Vaccine Phase 1/2 Clinical Trials. Vaccines 8:746
  33. Bhakdi, S.; Chiesa, M.; Frost, S.; Griesz-Brisson, M.; Haditsch, M.; Hockertz, S.; Johnson, L.; Kämmerer, U.; Palmer, M.; Reiss, K.; Sönnichsen, A.; Wodarg, W. and Yeadon, M. (2021) Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns.
  34. Bhakdi, S. (2021) Rebuttal letter to European Medicines Agency from Doctors for Covid Ethics, April 1, 2021.
  35. Ulm, J.W. (2020) Rapid response to: Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us.
  36. Reimann, N. (2021) Covid Spiking In Over A Dozen States — Most With High Vaccination Rates.
  37. Meredith, S. (2021) Chile has one of the world’s best vaccination rates. Covid is surging there anyway.
  38. Bhuyan, A. (2021) Covid-19: India sees new spike in cases despite vaccine rollout. BMJ 372:n854
  39. Morrissey, K. (2021) Open letter to Dr. Karina Butler.
  40. Anonymous, (2021) Open Letter from the UK Medical Freedom Alliance: Urgent warning re Covid-19 vaccine-related deaths in the elderly and Care Homes.
  41. Furer, V.; Zisman, D.; Kibari, A.; Rimar, D.; Paran, Y. and Elkayam, O. (2021) Herpes zoster following BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a case series. Rheumatology -:x-x
  42. Anonymous, (2021) Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations.
  43. Tseng, C.; Sbrana, E.; Iwata-Yoshikawa, N.; Newman, P.C.; Garron, T.; Atmar, R.L.; Peters, C.J. and Couch, R.B. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421
  44. Bolles, M.; Deming, D.; Long, K.; Agnihothram, S.; Whitmore, A.; Ferris, M.; Funkhouser, W.; Gralinski, L.; Totura, A.; Heise, M. and Baric, R.S. (2011) A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J. Virol. 85:12201–15
  45. Weingartl, H.; Czub, M.; Czub, S.; Neufeld, J.; Marszal, P.; Gren, J.; Smith, G.; Jones, S.; Proulx, R.; Deschambault, Y.; Grudeski, E.; Andonov, A.; He, R.; Li, Y.; Copps, J.; Grolla, A.; Dick, D.; Berry, J.; Ganske, S.; Manning, L. and Cao, J. (2004) Immunization with modified vaccinia virus Ankara-based recombinant vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome is associated with enhanced hepatitis in ferrets. J. Virol. 78:12672–6
  46. Czub, M.; Weingartl, H.; Czub, S.; He, R. and Cao, J. (2005) Evaluation of modified vaccinia virus Ankara based recombinant SARS vaccine in ferrets. Vaccine 23:2273–9
  47. Tinari, S. (2021) The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability. BMJ 372:n627
  48. Anonymous, (2021) Interview with Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Krüger.

Doctors for Covid Ethics

We are doctors and scientists from 30 countries, seeking to uphold medical ethics, patient safety and human rights in response to COVID-19. t: @Drs4CovidEthics

Doctors say “No” to Vaccine Passports – Instruct your MEP to do the same

On 28 April 2021 the European Parliament makes a decision on the issue of vaccine passports. Some of the most distinguished medical experts, scientists and lawyers are concerned about this ill-advised political intrusion into their specialist territories. As a result Doctors For COVID Ethics (D4CE) have collectively served notice of liability on all MEPs pointing to their liability under the Nuremberg Code regarding medical experimentation.

This comes against a background of short-term deaths, which are increasing at an alarming rate, and associated with the four vaccines. By 10 April 2021 deaths stood at 6,662. Even by the European Medicines Agency’s own figures a week later that number had increased by more than 1,100. This is despite at least two of the vaccines, Oxford/AstraZeneca and Pfizer/BioNTech, having been suspended in certain European countries.

Figures are from European Medicines Agency (Eudradiligence) while the above graphic comes courtesy of Health Impact News, whose editor, Brian Shilhavy, has broken down deaths and serious injuries for the individual vaccines together with assumed side effects from the four experimental jabs. For detailed information click the Health Impact News link. In brief totals are:




Oxford/Astra Zeneca












Doctors for Covid Ethics are serious in getting these discriminatory passports stopped on ethical grounds, regardless of what inducements might have been offered to individual MEPs. Emer Cooke, as executive director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), has been served notice three times of her liability.

The prime concern, though by no means the only one, is cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) – to you and me blood-clots in the brain – which doctors believe are being under-reported to the EMA for all four gene-based vaccines. Symptoms include: severe headaches, nausea and vomiting, impaired consciousness, speech, hearing or vision impairment and loss of motor-control.

Specialist doctors from D4CE believe figures reported by EMA are only a percentage of actual deaths, likewise for serious reactions. It is of particular concern that post-mortems are not being performed. According to D4CE a “deafening silence” ensues from coroners and pathologists, who also have a duty under the law. Thus the following requests for disclosures were made of Emer Cooke’s agency last week on 20 April 2021.

1) the effects of the gene-based vaccines on fertility in women of child bearing age, and in men

2) the number of cremations performed since and including 8 December 2020 and the number of burials since and including 8 December 2020 of those recorded as having died from COVID-19 on their death certificates, not necessarily in the European Union

3) the medical justification for the interval between the two Pfizer injections being increased at short notice from 3 weeks to 12 weeks, despite protests from Pfizer that they only possessed data for a three week interval

4) the medical justification for “mixing and matching” of different gene-based vaccines and

5) the medical justification for depriving recipients of the gene-based vaccines, in at least one European Union member state, of knowledge of which gene-based vaccine they have received.

As early as 1 March 2021 a warning was issued by D4CE to the European Medicines Agency that blood disorders including clotting and bleeding would be a likely consequence of the gene-based vaccines. No sooner had this warning been issued than a number of European member states suspended the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine for those very reasons. The message has not changed.

“Misleading populations into accepting investigational agents such as the gene-based COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, or coercing them through ‘vaccine passports’, constitutes clear and egregious violations of the Nuremberg Code”

Contact your MEP and tell him/her not to vote for vaccine passports

You can send them the above blog-piece or all Doctors for Covid Ethics letters.

Cry Freedom!

I have decided to stand in the Birmingham City Council elections for Billesley Ward, 6 May 2021.

The party for which I am standing is Freedom Alliance. It has only very recently been formed to challenge the totalitarian lockdown of society, without parliamentary debate, on the basis of an Act rushed through parliament in a couple of weeks which spanned the parliamentary recess.

If there is anyone in Birmingham who would care to help with my campaign please get in touch. You can do so via the contact page on this blog. Please head your message: Election.

Here are two Modigliani-style pages from my promotional leaflet which outlines some of my aims.

Tiffany Dover – are you all right?

A favourite Shakespearean quote of mine comes from A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Philostrate informs the Duke of Athens, Theseus, of some entertainment he has come across which is being rehearsed by simple workers for the wedding-night of Theseus to Hippolyta.

A play there is, my Lord, some ten words long

Which is as brief as I have known a play

But by ten words, my Lord, it is too long . . .

The beauty of this creation rests in each line of the message being ten words long – making it a play on words about a theatrical play, if you can still remember what it was like to see one of those. The play referred to is the hilarious play contained within A Midsummer Night’s Dream and performed by humble forest workmen, written and directed by Bottom, a weaver. It witnesses the thwarted love and tragic, though comical, deaths of Pyramus and Thisbe.

Plays are much longer than ten words – even this play within a play. But real life is something else.

I contacted CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, Tennessee by email, having tried once before without getting a reply. This is what I wrote:

Dear Karen Long

I wrote some time back from a different email address regarding Tiffany Dover who used to work at CHI Memorial. Tiffany was filmed taking a Pfizer BioNTech vaccine before collapsing. She later recovered enough to make a video of what happened. Then records of her death started to appear,

I was hoping for some response from CHI Memorial but received none. Sadly I have had to conclude that Tiffany is dead but would love to be proved wrong. I have written several blog-posts about Tiffany hoping that CHI Memorial would make some statement. There has been nothing. You will not like my latest and I would be happy to remove, or edit, it should the content prove to be wrong.

Tiffany Dover and Megi Bakradze – the big difference

I have copied xxxxxxx xxxxx, a medical doctor, into this email.

Yours sincerely,

John Goss

The response was little more than ten words long, but at least this time I got a response from Communications Manager, Karen Long.

We have made several statements. Tiffany is alive and continues her work as a nurse manager.


This is an easy statement to make. It could be true. I hope it is. But it does not detract from the fact that CHI Memorial were very eager for Tiffany to make a statement immediately after she recovered but for the last quarter have remained creepily silent. Months back there was also the video they made with someone else wearing an identity tag having Tiffany, Nurse Manager, emblazoned on it, which hardly inspires confidence. So I pursued my line of inquiry.

Dear Karen

Thank you for getting back to me. The two video statements I have seen are one of Tiffany herself, the same day as she was vaccinated and after she had recovered, and one a day or two later in which many assume Amber Honea, a friend of Tiffany’s, stood in for her wearing Tiffany’s identity tag. This is a photo from that video which now appears to have been removed from the internet.

Is there any chance of giving absolute proof that she is alive and well please? I would be most happy to publish this and put all the speculation to rest.

With her husband, Dustin, having changed his Facebook status to single and no posts from Tiffany on any of her social networking sites it adds fuel to the speculation that she is no longer with us. You could douse that speculation in a minute and that would surely be in the best interests of CHI Memorial too.


I got no response to this email.

We have entered the fourth month with no definite knowledge that Tiffany Dover is still alive. On checking CHI Memorial staff on the website I found three nurses called Tiffany, any of whom could have been promoted to nurse manager and thus make Karen Long’s statement almost factual. Facts don’t seem to be big on the agenda of CHI Memorial.

Despite all the adverse publicity surrounding the so-called vaccines, and deaths from vaccines, including it must be stated, Tiffany Dover’s, CHI Memorial is still pushing vaccination as good medical practice. Dr. Paul Cornea, MD, Infectious Disease Specialist, says:

Vaccination is only one of the mechanisms of providing immunity, and it works by simulating an infection and tricking the host’s immune system into creating immune cells and antibodies. The vaccines work by introducing a small part of the virus or bacteria to an uninfected person. Sometimes an inactive version or similar versions of the virus/bacteria are introduced to stimulate your body’s response.

That might be true for traditional vaccines, but it is misleading in the case of SARS-COV-2, and he knows it, because in the previous paragraph he says:

There are currently two artificially created products that have specific antibodies against the Sars-CoV-2 virus attachment protein, commonly known as Corona Virus.

In his article Dr. Cornea is mainly talking about vaccines derived from the virus itself, like polio, smallpox and measles’ vaccines. What he should have said about these COVID “vaccines” is that they are an experimental injection of untested concoctions the short-term and long-terms results of which are unknown.

These mRNA experimental brews are not even vaccines, but gene therapies. Even the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture them call them that. Dr. Joseph Mercola questions whether they can actually change a person’s DNA and turn those jabbed into transhumans – something a Catholic hospital like CHI Memorial should be most concerned about. It is man playing God,

As things stand, and I have given communications manager, Karen Long, ample time to reply, it must be concluded that Tiffany Dover is dead, as dead as if stabbed with the “bloody blameful blade” of Pyramus . Why CHI Memorial Hospital has not dealt with this speculation is beyond me.

UK ‘pandemic’ death toll to 2021

Pandemics kill people – in large numbers. According to city records between July and October the Great Plague of 1665 killed 68,596 people in London alone. The figure is thought to have been much higher but working with that figure alone, with an estimated population of 460,000 means one in every six to seven people died. It was a real epidemic.

In 1665-6 in the small village of Eyam, Derbyshire, an estimated one in three inhabitants, 263 in total, died of the plague. Unlike London. Eyam locked down to prevent the spread. There may well be a good lesson there for all of us. So what about the UK Covid-19 “pandemic” everyone is talking about? Ignore Covid-19 for a minute and just look at the total deaths from all causes other than the alleged Covid-19 deaths.

The source for this Macrotrends graph is here. Take little if any notice of the green and red graph which has nothing to do with per capita deaths and look at the blue line above. Deaths from all causes in 2020 are up very slightly on the previous year 9,429 as opposed to 9.413 in 2019. But these figures, apparently do not contain deaths where COVID-19 is mentioned.

On 19 March 2021 the ONS should have released the total deaths from all causes report. When September figures were released in December that was the stated release date. Now it has been changed to: “To be confirmed.”

Although statistics have not been released the Guardian appears to have had them back in January when whore to the rich elite released this scaremongering headline: “2020 was the deadliest year in a century for England and Wales, says ONS”.

It is of course a porky dressed up as the truth. What it fails to add is that these deaths are total deaths. The population just after the First World War was already depleted and in 1921 following the flu pandemic stood at 33,561,235 (source Wikipedia). Today it is in the region of 68,146, 590 according to the Worldometers website – more than twice as high. For the once respected Guardian (probably going back to when it was The Manchester Guardian) it is just another fail. Indeed, if the source of this information was ONS it clearly states:

But comparing 2020 with 1918 is not comparing like for like. The population in England and Wales has increased from 34 million in 1918 to around 60 million today, so per 100,000, more people died in 1918, highlighting the importance of viewing these deaths in a proportionate and balanced way.

That was something the Guardian hacks chose to ignore.

It can only be speculated that ONS is sitting on the total deaths report while some government think-tank can come up with a way of presenting them that gives some credibility to their intent.

Statisticians, who log monthly reports of deaths, have the figures already. This graph shows what has been happening with Covid deaths and as ONS figures reveal the number has been falling significantly. However there has been a spike in unexplained deaths which coincides with the vaccination of our most elderly and vulnerable. This is one published by Joel Smalley.

As regards a “pandemic” people must continue to ask themselves how many others they know who are falling down dead from Covid-19. There is no pandemic and never was. So what are they asking us to be vaccinated against?

And if they are not vaccinating us against a “pandemic” what is the purpose of the mass vaccination scheme?

Resignation from Labour Party due to the new Fascism

This morning I contacted the Labour Party and resigned. Keir Starmer is the worst leader the Labour Party has had in my lifetime. He has supported the new dictatorship from start to finish. I sent a brief message outlining why I have resigned.

“Please remove me from membership of the Labour Party forthwith and cancel all subscriptions.

The New Fascism where parliamentary democracy is overridden by dictatorship of the Three Stooges behind lecterns is not for me. My parents’ generation fought a war to defeat this kind of thing.”

It is Labour Party policy, and Keir Starmer, whore to the establishment, is the problem. That goes for all he drags along, or down, with him.

I also wrote to my MP.

“Dear Steve McCabe

I was not surprised to see you were not one of the 76 opposers of an extension to the new fascism over parliamentary democracy – where Matt Hancock and another two stooges stand behind lecterns to dictate what unqualified restrictions can be made on an unsuspecting and long-suffering electorate. It has not gone unnoticed. And will not be forgotten.

John Goss”

What is happening in my beloved country is terrifying. I am fighting it with all my heart and all the strength God gives me.

Please watch the video above. It is Tracey O’ Mahony, Barrister at Law in Ireland – which is still part of the EU. She points to clauses in the passport legislation they want to impose. It is in the pipeline here in the UK so it affects all of us.

All governments are singing from the same musical score. It is praise to the Devil.

If you are Irish do all you can to oppose this crippling legislation which is being steamrolled through. That’s what they did with the Coronavirus Act 2020 for which Steve McCabe M.P. just voted for an extension. It is just another stricture, not to free you, but to enslave you. If you are in the UK remember this is coming your way too. Remember too who votes for it.

I have not forgotten that Steve McCabe voted for the War in Iraq.

Tiffany Dover and Megi Bakradze – the big difference

First let me say I should not have to be writing this blog about the deaths of two young nurses and my heart goes out to the families of both. It is however essential that the facts around adverse reactions to wanton vaccination with untested vaccines should be questioned.

What is more these deaths, and others like them, have occurred when the virus which they are being vaccinated against is no longer killing people in large numbers. Herd immunity is already prevalent throughout the globe, and China, where it has been assumed the virus, SARS-COV-2, originated, has long been back to normal.

Megi Brakadze, 27, had her injection but within 24 hours was dead. They managed to restart her heart but were not able to revive her completely. Megi’s death comes a week after Italian clarinet teacher, Sandro Tognatti, died following the Oxford/AstraZeneca jab.

There are similarities between the death of Tiffany Dover and that of Megi Brakadze. Both died after taking a new untested vaccine. Both encouraged others to take a vaccine before they died. Neither died immediately. Both were filmed as part of a promotional drive. Both were young women about 30 years old. Both were nurses. Both clearly had faith in vaccines.

There are differences too.

Megi Brakadze receives her Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccination

Differences between Megi and Tiffany are that one lived in Georgia, Europe, and the other in the USA. Megi had the Oxford/AstraZeneca jab (with genetically modified content) and Tiffany had the Pfizer/BioNTech jab (mRNA). But the biggest difference of all was this.

Georgia admitted straight away that Megi had died.

The Catholic hospital, Memorial, Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Pfizer BioNTech, have constantly lied and tried to cover up the death of Tiffany. The death itself is tragic enough, but the cover-up is deplorable.

Another letter to my MP Steve McCabe

My M.P. is hell-bent on getting everybody vaccinated despite the concerns of sensible people who have studied the facts. I share my letter because an automated response talks about prioritising due to the pandemic (the nonsense pandemic).

Dear Steve McCabe M. P., 19 March 2021

Thank your for your circular constituency letter dated March 2021. I am compelled to take issue with the last five paragraphs, in which you are urging constituents to subject themselves to untested vaccines.

I am working with eminent medical doctors, scientists and lawyers internationally to challenge the narrative on vaccinations against Covid-19.

You write: “. . . The vaccine is essential to combating the pandemic and returning to a more normal life, so that we can enjoy all the things we have missed – meeting up with family and friends; going out to social events; shopping for non-essential items.”

First let me draw your attention to a chart. It is ONS reported deaths from all causes in England.

Columns in blue represent the virus. By Friday 8 January deaths from Covid-19 have virtually disappeared (or are negligible). What is disturbing though is the number of unexplained deaths that have suddenly appeared about the same time the vaccination programme was begun on our elderly. Where is the “pandemic” we are supposed to be combating?

Your promise that if people take the inadequately-tested vaccine things will get back to normal is the same promise made exactly a year ago (19 March 2020) being “Three Weeks to Flatten the Curve.” Look what happened! Twelve months on and we are getting the same carrot dangled before our eyes.

You say that “take up in Billesley is not as high as other parts of the constituency which is quite worrying”.

Why should it be worrying? Nobody has provided any evidence – especially Matt Hancock and his goons Sir Patrick Vallance and Professor Christopher Whitty – that the SARS-COV-2 virus has been fully isolated in a pure environment. People have made FOI requests for this information and the government cannot provide it. It is a scam! And you are part of it.

I made a request of the NHS National Immunisation Management Services (NIMS) to answer 7 questions (12 February 2021). I asked one of their clinicians, Dee Power and was promised an answer:

Can you get me actual proof that the full path of virus has been isolated in clinical conditions?

Can you get me proper medical proof that the vaccines work?

Can you get me genuine clinical proof that the PCR test works as a diagnostic tool for this virus?

Can you tell me how many amplifications are being used in the PCR test to diagnose COVID-19?

Can you give me medical or scientific evidence that the wearing of masks stops the spread of the virus?

Can you give me medical or scientific evidence that social-distancing stops the spread of the virus?

Can you give me medical or scientific evidence that lockdowns stop the spread of the virus?

Not one of these questions was answered, and yet you are recklessly pushing constituents of Billesley to take a vaccine, the long-term effects of which are unknown, while the short-term effects appear to be devastating – but covered up. It is nonsense to write: “By taking the vaccine, when your time comes, you are playing your part in defeating the virus [what virus?] and protecting yourself and your family.” Have you got knowledge the rest of us are denied?

John Goss


By authority of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation, I do hereby exercise my right to refuse to submit to or to administer the COVID-19 vaccine.

The United States Government has prosecuted, convicted and executed Medical Doctors who have violated the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation.

Aiders and abettors of Nuremberg Crimes are equally guilty and have also been prosecuted, convicted, and executed.”

Francis A. Boyle.

(My emphasis)

Tiffany Dover – murdered by lethal injection

Not everybody will have seen the video of 11th March concerning the death of Tiffany Pontes Dover. It is good, but this, from a Rumble French site is probably better.

The above link gives more information including an interview, in English, from someone who tried to contact Memorial Hospital to speak with Tiffany. The person spoken to would not confirm whether she was alive or dead but just kept repeating go to the Memorial website and “try to contact her house supervisor.”

I have emailed the hospital making a similar request for information. My email was ignored.

This is Tiffany and her husband Dustin. How Pfizer-BioNTech could murder such an active young woman with their vaccine and try to cover it up, even though the world had witnessed the event, is beyond credibility. What is happening all over regarding this nonsense virus is beyond credibility. I still never meet anybody who has Covid-19. Neither does anyone else.

The cover image shows Tiffany receiving the lethal Covid-19 vaccine which killed her. I reproduce it here because cover images are so small.

It makes you wonder what inducements Memorial Hospital and Pfizer BioNTech have offered her family to keep quiet about her death. My suspicion is that Big Pharma have killed the story and made threats against the family. The family seem so good and honest I am sure they would speak out if permitted. After all, Dustin Dover recorded his wife’s death. But this information can no longer be accessed.

While I have breath I will not allow the truth to die with Tiffany. It is not fair to her memory. She was engaged in caring. She would not want to be part of a mass murder initiative.

The Zionist agenda – vaccinate Jews first

In the global effort to get everyone who breathes God’s fresh air vaccinated with untested vaccines Netanyahu is leading the push. The rest of the world can expect the same measures coming their way very soon, if they are not already experiencing them.

Israeli politician, health advisor and information officer for the Rappeh (Healing) Party, Ilana Rachel Daniel, explains what is happening in her homeland. Anybody with the common sense not to take these untested vaccines is being made to feel a pariah, excluded from social events, theatre, shopping malls.

“They’re making this green passport where half the population cannot get into theatres or malls or all sorts of things unless you have taken the vaccination. They are creating a medical Apartheid.

They’re making people wear an ankle bracelet, a security bracelet when they come back from travelling. It’s absolutely insane.”

On top of this media censorship is excluding any alternative viewpoint to the mass-vaccination programme. The passport is going to be a prerequisite to social interaction all over the world.

Vaccination passports are already being piloted in the United States as can be seen from the cover image. It was stolen from an OffGuardian article by CJ Hopkins which I urge my readers to read.

Those who should really be reading it are the fleeced ungulates with the wool pulled over their eyes and mouths. “Lambs to the slaughter” springs to mind.

People working towards a saner, safer world, as well as Ilana Rachel Daniel, include Irish medical doctor, Anne McCloskey.

They’re coming for you, your family, your jobs, your savings, your home, your pension, your culture, your traditions, your freedom, your very way of life. Unless we unite to resist.

Uniting to resist is the only way these arrogant globalists can be challenged. They know it. That is why they are pushing for people to be vaccinated against a virus which has run its course. Look at this chart. It is from the Office of National Statistics and put together by Joel Smalley.

Covid deaths are in blue. They have virtually disappeared. A new, very worrying, light brown incidence of deaths that are unexplained seems to coincide with the mass vaccination programme. This fell during early February possibly because the elderly ceased to be the main priority for vaccination.

In corroboration of the fact that we are being censored the source for my post on what “they are not telling you” has been taken down from the world’s biggest social networking platform.

Finally, consider what Dr Lee Merit had to say in February this year. It could save your life. Her CV in medicine is as long as your arm. If anyone knows what is going on – it is she. She says we are at war. And we are.

One concern of hers is “for the integrity and moral turpitude of the medical profession” members of which are going along with this mass experiment. Animals in the SARS and MERS studies, ferrets and cats, died. This was not from the vaccine at the time it was administered but from “immune enhancement, or antibody induced enhancement, or antibody dependent enhancement” ADE.

Basically, if you take the vaccine you may well be doomed, not today, but in the future when exposed to another coronavirus. Professor Dolores Cahill talked about this too – this cytokine storm created from the introduction of a modification to your personal RNA which tricks the body into thinking that a coronavirus is not an enemy. When introduced it is then allowed to proliferate freely in the body creating sepsis until the main organs fail.

As Dr. Merit says it is up to you whether you take the vaccine. But the decision should be informed. Which it is not at the moment.

Passports are what the Nazis used. Nazi doctors who went along with the experiments on human beings without informed consent were found guilty of crimes against humanity. That is what your doctor is doing to you now when not explaining properly the risks involved.

People who have the least knowledge of symbolism will notice the German Imperial eagle on the Jewish passport. The same people are in control. They never went away.